Hi, There were a thread discussing about travel sponsorship for this year, I am unable to find it now, so allow me a new thread to send my proposal.
* Forgetting about travel sponsorhip until March 1st Some people was commenting in that thread and in IRC about dropping directly the travel sponsorship for this year because it seems unlikely we'll have money. Others argued providing travel sponsorship is very important because if not some people won't never be able to go to debconf (I agree with this). What about not considering travel sponsorship in the budget and in the beginning of March, when we know better how much money we'll have we reconsider it again? It will still give people time to do travel arrangements if the decision is taken soon. * Managing travel sponsorship request in a different way I would also like to propose removing all the debconf travel sponsorship system from the $PENTA_REPLACEMENT and just ask people needing travel sponsorship to send an email to the travel sponsorship committee explaining why they need sponsorship, how much money this person think it will be needed and how much help need. This allow the committee contact the person directly asking for more details and also discussing the involvement of that person in Debian by the committee (not everybody knows everybody). This could be tracked via a RT ticket, for example. This would address the main flaw I saw in the penta-approach: the system is quite impersonal and it lacks communication between the committee and the people needing sponsorship. Ana _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
