Richard Darst <r...@zgib.net> writes: > So what this means is that basically, all our travel sponsorship is > coming straight from the surplus. Spending 18 k$ of the 25 k$ surplus > for travel sponsorship seems reasonable and fiscally responsible. > Given other cost reductions, we could still expect a surplus for dc13 > of 10-30 k$ once it as all done. So at this point I'm not > recommending any more budget for travel sponsorship, unless you'd > like to decrease our surplus more.
So far dc chairs (hi gunnar!) have only acked to $15k. If we (herb team) should spend $18k, then confirmation is needed from "the powers that be". d _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
