Hi,
On Freitag, 17. Februar 2012, Moray Allan wrote:
> I'm a bit confused here -- Andrew was suggesting that we advertise
> each level as starting a little above the actual lower threshold (to
> give negotiating room), whereas you seem to be saying we should change
> some thresholds, including lowering them for the higher levels? I'm
> not necessarily complaining if so, just confused as the current
> thresholds were your own proposal in the last meeting, and because
> it's a different topic from what Andrew was saying. :)
>
> I was also assuming that Andrew's "published levels" were *minimums*,
> whereas you are saying "up to" for the same amounts.
Actually I didnt read his proposal like this. And if I would, 2000$ would be a
too high entry for steel, 5k too high for bronze and so on.
> Can we decide as two separate questions what the levels should be and
> how we'll advertise them? -- Or, equivalently, decide one set of level
> thresholds, but slightly higher than we will truly insist on.
I'd advertise the levels as we want them and only as a total exception
negoiate them down.
> If we do that and don't change anything else there's a rather small
> difference in benefit between silver and gold, for a large price
> difference -- are you also proposing to move another benefit down to
> gold from platinum?
If we dont that, the diff between bronze+silver is too little (IMO), so I
rather have little diff between silver+gold, as I think companies will opt for
gold rather for "perceived benefits of being gold instead of silver" (=more
generous to Debian, eg) instead of the "real benefits".
cheers,
Holger
_______________________________________________
Debconf-team mailing list
Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
