On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 07:51, Martin Schulze <j...@infodrom.org> wrote: > Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: >> Additionally, keeping the separation will further the feeling in the >> community that DebConf and Debian are two separate entities, while they > That's up to you. You don't need to tell the community that you're > tracking money separately.
I thought there used to be a separate earmark for DebConf in the SPI accounts too; but there doesn't seem to be now. Having FFIS work the same as SPI does from Debian's POV seems like a win. (I just wrote an email about how having a separate account would make sense because it'd be just like SPI, then deleted it when I found out SPI doesn't seem to actually be like that. How is anyone currently keeping track of how much DebConf is making/losing in the US, without a specific earmark in the SPI accounts, btw? For comparison, for linux.conf.au we just have financial statements for each conference, which to date has always ended up as a net positive, so year-to-year tradeoffs haven't mattered.) Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <a...@erisian.com.au> _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
