Hello, On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 01:19:57AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> No. You (leader@, auditor@) will need to do this on their own. > > If you want to keep track of the money separately, you'd better keep > it marked Debconf<n> and give leader@, auditor@ authority over it as > well. That is what I thought, and why I asked. Of course, the way to keep balances separate is to put them is separate accounts. I agree with the goal here, but... My efforts at tracking DebConf money have not gone so well. This is in part caused by me not ever having access to look at accounts, and not being (on site|in charge of money) once DebConf starts. Other people have had more success than me. Thus, I encourage you all to think about how the DebConf share of Debian money will be tracked. My first reaction is "I don't want to be the one doing it". I was going to try to make better money management my goal this year, but if the safest tool for it is taken away, I'm not sure if I want to be the one attempting this anymore. There is plenty else that could be said, such as "well, if you were actually able to see DebConf accounts, you wouldn't find things so hard", but that can come if anyone is interested in talking about it. I'm fine with zack spending DebConf money in an emergency, I'm fine merging accounts as long as I'm not the one in charge of tracking things, and maybe I'd be fine trying to track things if we found a way to do it better. How do you all imagine the DebConf/Debian money separation would work if accounts are merged? - Richard -- | Richard Darst - rkd@ - boltzmann: up 577 days, 6:36 | http://rkd.zgib.net - pgp 0xBD356740 | "Ye shall know the truth and -- the truth shall make you free" _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
