> I'd love to hear from people like Micah who did check the box and > who were frustrated this year if they think such a solution would > work well.
I am in the same position as Micah, especially since I've been
raising this issue for many years, and since I generally don't want
my photos released in public space.
Differently coloured lanyards would work under three conditions:
1. people actually respect them,
2. we find 95%-proof means to blur people with those lanyards, and
3. those people always wear those lanyards when cameras are
around.
But I think that all three of those fail:
1. In the heat of the moment, you might not see the lanyard;
2. Having done picture analysis for many years, this is neigh
impossible. It could be done by a human. Are we ready to expect
this from everyone, at the risk of demotivating e.g. Aigars?
3. I do take my lanyard off occasionally, e.g. when playing
Frisbee, or at the pub. What now?
Unfortunately, other than human post-processing, or conference-wide
vetting (default to non-publishing), I don't have any better
solutions.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <madd...@debconf.org> @martinkrafft
: :' : DebConf orga team
`. `'`
`- DebConf15: Heidelberg, Germany: http://debconf15.debconf.org
DebConf16 in your country? https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf16
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
_______________________________________________ Debconf-discuss mailing list Debconf-discuss@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss
