Thanks for your response! I've taken a look at those and I agree it changes the computation of the integrals to use the correct mapping, but I don't see how it changes the mesh representation. Does it? Or do I need to do something else?
I feel like what I want is closer to step-49 - ideally I'd like to use the transform of a mesh, but with the identify transform and a higher order representation for the new mesh. On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 1:02:29 PM UTC-4 Wolfgang Bangerth wrote: > On 4/7/22 10:46, Teo Collin wrote: > > ** > > > > I am asking about the mapping. I know it won't make a difference in > terms of > > the accuracy of my solution, but it will make a difference in terms of > > time/flops/memory/etc, which is what I want to see. > > Then all you have to do is define a mapping class, and use it everywhere > you > do integrals. Take a look at step-10 and -11, for example. > > Best > W. > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Wolfgang Bangerth email: bang...@colostate.edu > www: http://www.math.colostate.edu/~bangerth/ > > -- The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/ For mailing list/forum options, see https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "deal.II User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dealii+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dealii/d75bb2b2-e33c-4234-bdbb-fa1a2257c1d1n%40googlegroups.com.
