Thanks for your time commenting - I've identified a number of issues with the voxel-oriented data I had, and thus reverted to original meshes which should now make it currently feasible to approximate to the necessary accuracy without adding PDEs
On Friday, April 2, 2021 at 8:37:15 PM UTC+1 Wolfgang Bangerth wrote: > > David, > > > My Q is: is it likely to be feasible/sensible to use deal.II to analyse > stress > > during 3D printing within a resin bath, and to use it to dynamically add > > support structures or modify printing parameters (eg speed which the > actively > > built face is pulled off the printing face) to avoid excessive traction > force > > and print failure. > > In the end, deal.II is a tool for building PDE solvers, not for solving > any > specific application. So, if you can describe what you want to do via what > I > think is probably going to be a PDE-based open-loop optimal control > problem, > then one can start thinking about the specifics of whether deal.II is the > right tool. > > People do use deal.II for additive manufacturing simulations. Take a look > here, for example: > https://github.com/MeltPoolDG/MeltPoolDG > > Best > Wolfgang > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Wolfgang Bangerth email: bange...@colostate.edu > www: http://www.math.colostate.edu/~bangerth/ > > -- The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/ For mailing list/forum options, see https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "deal.II User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dealii+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dealii/a4632c61-1eff-4cc5-adf3-38ee7e5aa248n%40googlegroups.com.
