On 08/27/2018 06:58 PM, Loylick wrote:
Thank you, Wolfgang, for your suggestion. I've read step-11 tutorial but I still can not figure out what kind of constraints I can impose in my case.

What does the literature suggest how to handle this situation?


Here is a picture of a void with enriched nodes. Blue triangls are enriched with Heaviside function, red rectangles are zero degrees of freedom. When there are no whole cells inside a void (only cells intersected by the boundary are inside a void) I have a regular solution.

You mean you have a solution for the blue cases but not the red ones?


If at least one cell
is inside a void entirly (no intersection with void's boundary) I get a singular matrix. Correct me if I'm wrong, I think I could put one (or some) of enriched nodes inside a void to be zero and constrain red rectangle nodes to be equal to some neighbor nodes with enrichment. Or I'm missing something and there is a "right"
way to treat this case?

Possibly. But I don't know what the mathematical analysis suggests you can or cannot do. As I mentioned, it would be useful to know what other people have done before.

Best
 W.


--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth          email:                 bange...@colostate.edu
                           www: http://www.math.colostate.edu/~bangerth/

--
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see 
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "deal.II User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to dealii+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to