Thanks for the response. I think this is worth a try. However, as the electric field calculation is entirely decoupled from the nonlinear currents & heating part, which need to be solved by newton's method, then wouldn't it be effective to just once calculate the field and then start the newton iterations for only temperature and currents (probably the performance can be made the same, but perhaps code readability decreases)? And the second thing is that I want a modular code, where you can choose if you want to only calculate electric fields and disregard currents & heating or calculate both, in this case it would also be good to keep the codes separate. So it would be really convenient to have a some kind a fast function like "evaluate_gradient_in_quadrature_point(int index)" or something similar.
On Saturday, July 30, 2016 at 1:38:06 PM UTC+3, Daniel Arndt wrote: > > krei, > > If you want to solve different PDEs on different domains that can be > discretized by a common mesh, the preferred approach is to use a hp-vector > finite element. > This means that on each of your subdomains all blocks of your finite > element but one are of type FENothing. > You might want to have a look into step-46 for how to do this. > > Best, > Daniel > -- The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/ For mailing list/forum options, see https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "deal.II User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dealii+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
