Ok, as long as you know what you are doing. Sounds reasonable.
Aleksandr Dezhin <m...@dezhin.net> schreef:
>On 01.01.2014 20:11, Paul J Stevens wrote:
>> your dbmail.conf says:
>>
>> max_db_connections = 50
>>
>>
>> which is a potential performance killer.
>>
>>
>http://blog.dbmail.eu/archives/14-Whats-up-with-max_db_connections.html
>Perhaps, but we are still in search of a suitable value. I read your
>post, but could not understand what value should be used in our case.
>With the default value there are errors in the log. We use two dbmail
>instances on different servers and haproxy to distribute connections
>between servers.
>
>In this scenario, each server serves about 250 IMAP connections
>simultaneously. However, it is important that in the case of a fall of
>one of the remaining servers could serve all 500 connections. So it
>seems we need some reserve in max_db_connections.
>_______________________________________________
>DBmail mailing list
>DBmail@dbmail.org
>http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
--
Verzonden van mijn Android telefoon met K-9 Mail.
_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
