Giorgio70165 wrote:
Thinked in a local lan use, still keep the potential low efficient and
low-latency storage ?
I mean that whenever a mail is searched through a sql query, the user
got the mail and the url to the related attachments in a local-lan
server.
Anyway I think it could be difficult to handle thousands of doc,pdf and
those kind of attachment directly encoded into the database in raw mail
format, I estimated not less that 24Gb/year of archived mail size.
You could store attachments in a separate table to keep text searches
usable.....
--
Sandino Araico Sa'nchez
-- Lo que no mata engorda.
