* Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081203, 21:52]: > And by then, unless very careful you'd be dropping dbmail's keyfeature: > efficient, low-latancy storage. > > Implemention of external storage of attachments without losing it's > performance requires an asynchronous architecture that is currently > missing from the codebase.
Thinked in a local lan use, still keep the potential low efficient and low-latency storage ? I mean that whenever a mail is searched through a sql query, the user got the mail and the url to the related attachments in a local-lan server. Anyway I think it could be difficult to handle thousands of doc,pdf and those kind of attachment directly encoded into the database in raw mail format, I estimated not less that 24Gb/year of archived mail size. bye
