Roel Rozendaal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) écrivait: > >Hi, > >we do like this idea but i think it would be best to retain this in the >long-term todo list - that is not scheduling it for release 1.0. It simply >is a major change to the table structure. Besides we would like to discuss >the current structure to see what other optimizations/changes would be >favorable.
Ok, I hope this will be done in the next future. Sam. >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Sam Przyswa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <dbmail@dbmail.org> >Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 6:26 PM >Subject: Re: [Dbmail] Again: TODO > > >> Philip Warner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> > >> > >> >A few suggestions... >> > >> >> [...] >> >> >4. Nice-to-have: break up mail headers into a table >> >--------------------------------------------------- >> > >> >ie. parse the mail headers and store (a copy?) in a separate table. eg. >> > >> >Create Table message_headers(id, message_idnr, header, value) might >contain: >> > <unique-id>, <message-id>, 'to', '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >> > <unique-id>, <message-id>, 'from', '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >> >> We have talking about this a couple of month ago, these headers fields >might be >> into messages table as the flags, it will be nice for search features or >CRM app >> with the right indices. -- Sam Przyswa - Chef de projet Arial Concept - Intégrateur Internet 36, rue de Turin - 75008 - Paris Tel: 01 40 54 86 04 - Fax: 01 40 54 83 01 Web: http://www.arial-concept.com - Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
