I think it should be a separate repo under darktable org, same as dtorg website. That way dtdocs can have less technical but more writting oriented maintainers lowering the burden of keeping docs in main repo.
sob., 17 paź 2020, 09:26 użytkownik Pascal Obry <pas...@obry.net> napisał: > > Congrats! I'm looking forward moving away from docbook. > > I suppose one difficult point would be to reuse existing translation > but this is very important. The pr_BR manual is up to date and the > fr_FR one is 90% (was complete for 2.6). As translating the manual > needs countless hours we cannot tell the translators to start from > scratch again. > > Another question, I suppose this will be merged back at some point in > current darktable repository ? So we will probably need to coordinate. > > Anyway keep us informed about the progress. > > -- > Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78) > > The best way to travel is by means of imagination > > http://www.obry.net > > gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key F949BD3B > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > darktable developer mailing list > to unsubscribe send a mail to > darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > > ___________________________________________________________________________ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
