Good morning, I submit a problem for which he has lost sleep without ever finding a valid explanation, maybe you can help me understand if it is due to a bug, a wrong setting or something else. DarkTable when opening my shots reproduces .jpeg and .raf files in a totally different way. >From the screenshots you can find at this link, you can evaluate yourself.
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1jhPJJmv08gg8jzsyGnvgzwXiymAHiOMh?usp=sharing The "clearest" images refer to jpegs, these images are also identical to how the camera shows them during shooting and preview. Some thoughts: 1. With other software the difference that exists anyway, since we talk about jpeg files already processed and compressed by the camera and untreated raw files, is not so marked. . The setting applied to the camera is minimal and the profile is the Provia / Standard . This behavior is present even if in a different way, even with shots taken at ISO100 (ie without sensor amplification) . Even using the Clut tables created to emulate the same effect (Provia / Standard), the difference is huge, in fact with those it is not clear how colors are changed, so they are simply useless. I write to you because my goal is to get jpeg / raw (similar) files considering the natural and physiological differences that pass between these two output files. Now if I start working on a .raf file, it's because I want to improve the jpeg on camera for various reasons. Currently working on the .raf file I have to work only to get similar results to the jpeg on camera, which makes the work of developing the raw files useless. Thanks Lorenzo Fontanella ___________________________________________________________________________ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
