Thank you for this comprehensive reply. Cheers,
Timur. On Tue, 2019-05-28 at 11:55 +0200, parafin wrote: > Basically it was decided that depending on just fonts-roboto is the > right thing to do. In oldstable Debian it's the only package that > exists > and it contains the actual fonts, in other Debians it's a meta- > package > that depends on actual package (-hinted in stable, -unhinted in > newer). Looks like that in testing and unstable -hinted package is > dummy and doesn't contain anything. So your original request to > depend > on all variants makes sense only for stable, but you mention Debian > Next, which I assume is testing. I'm not sure what's this whole mess > with -hinted and -unhinted is all about, but anyway it doesn't look > like packagers should care about it, fonts-roboto is the right thing > to > depend on. > > As for requires vs recommends dependency there was a disagreement. > pmjdebruijn chose "recommends" for his Ubuntu packages, darix on the > other hand thinks that "requires" is the right thing to do. I don't > think we managed to convince him otherwise, it's his decision in the > end after all. > ___________________________________________________________________________ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
