I'm not found on the idea of the style picker in dark room mode either.

So far the philosophy of Darktable seems to be the darkroom is about photo
editing, the light table is about management.
Having something not related to the photo editing in the darkroom seems not
appropriate to me.



Le ven. 26 avr. 2019 22:14, William Ferguson <wpfergu...@gmail.com> a
écrit :

>
>
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 1:26 PM Julian Rickards <julian.ricka...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> In the top message in this thread, I did propose some options. Here they
>> are again.
>>  - over/underexposure and raw overexposure with the histogram (I think
>> Adobe Lightroom has the over/underexposure right within the histogram)
>>  - style picker removed and the Style module moved from the Lightroom
>> mode to Darkroom mode
>>
> I use the style module in lighttable a lot.  I have styles for noise
> reduction, sharpening, watermarking, etc that I apply to large selections
> of images all at once. I shoot sports and process lots of images.  Applying
> styles in lighttable mode speeds up my workflow tremendously.
>
>>  - soft proof might be better to be within the Lightroom mode (but I'll
>> admit that I've never used it)
>>  - gamut check might be better within the Input Color Profile module as
>> it appears to be the module that can address any issues: the Perspective
>> module has the option of identifying vertical and horizontal lines before
>> you decide to apply a correction, the gamut check could work the same way
>> in the Input Color Profile module
>>
>> I've never used the Presets quick picker and for the life of me, I can't
>> remember what the 6th option is.
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 1:08 PM Patrick Shanahan <p...@opensuse.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> * Julian Rickards <julian.ricka...@gmail.com> [04-26-19 10:42]:
>>> > Ah, yes, that is a better description.
>>> >
>>> > However, I still maintain that they are not relevant to the film strip
>>> > which (obviously) is part of the bottom panel but more relevant to
>>> other
>>> > components of the interface.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks for the correction.
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 9:38 AM Patrick Shanahan <p...@opensuse.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > * Julian Rickards <julian.ricka...@gmail.com> [04-26-19 08:54]:
>>> > > > Hi:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > There are 6 options that appear below the main view window in
>>> Darkroom
>>> > > > mode: soft proof, over/underexposure, raw overexposed warning,
>>> presets,
>>> > > > access to styles and one other that I can't determine here. Access
>>> to
>>> > > these
>>> > > > options are tied to the visibility of the film strip which I think
>>> is
>>> > > wrong.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I believe that the over/underexposure and raw overexposed warning
>>> buttons
>>> > > > should be placed below or at the side of the histogram, it makes
>>> more
>>> > > sense.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I believe that the Styles module in the Lightable mode should be
>>> moved to
>>> > > > the Darkroom mode and therefore the quick access to the styles
>>> button on
>>> > > > the film strip can be removed altogether.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I believe that the Soft Proof button would make more sense in the
>>> > > Lightroom
>>> > > > module or perhaps below the preview window at the top left.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I don't recall using the quick access to presets so I can't
>>> comment on
>>> > > that.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > And the last button, I'm not sure what it is.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > However, the main thrust of this suggestion is that visibility and
>>> access
>>> > > > to these options are tied to the visibility of the filmstrip which
>>> makes
>>> > > no
>>> > > > sense to me.
>>> > >
>>> > > no, not the film strip but to the bottom panel.  visibility of the
>>> options
>>> > > do not depend on the film strip being visible.
>>> > >
>>> > > bottom panel = <ctrl><shift><B>
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > (paka)Patrick Shanahan       Plainfield, Indiana, USA
>>> @ptilopteri
>>> > > http://en.opensuse.org    openSUSE Community Member
>>> facebook/ptilopteri
>>> > > Registered Linux User #207535                    @
>>> http://linuxcounter.net
>>> > > Photos: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/piwigo               paka @ IRCnet
>>> freenode
>>> > >
>>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>>> > > darktable developer mailing list
>>> > > to unsubscribe send a mail to
>>> > > darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>>
>>> yes, they are not relevant to the "film strip" and are not tied to it.
>>> but they both exist within the bottom panel.  if you believe they would
>>> be better located, why, instead of just saying it is wrong, don't you
>>> suggest "that better location"?
>>>
>>> instead of saying something would be better in a different manner,
>>> suggest
>>> the better manner so your suggestions can be followed.
>>>
>>> --
>>> (paka)Patrick Shanahan       Plainfield, Indiana, USA
>>> @ptilopteri
>>> http://en.opensuse.org    openSUSE Community Member
>>> facebook/ptilopteri
>>> Registered Linux User #207535                    @
>>> http://linuxcounter.net
>>> Photos: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/piwigo               paka @ IRCnet
>>> freenode
>>>
>>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>>> darktable developer mailing list
>>> to unsubscribe send a mail to
>>> darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
>>>
>>>
>> Bill
>
>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>> darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to
>> darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
>>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to
> darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
>

___________________________________________________________________________
darktable developer mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org

Reply via email to