On 12/10/17 22:57, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 12. Oktober 2017, 17:24:30 CEST schrieb Marcello Mamino:
>> I can reproduce the bug on Debian stable, under Xfce, master branch
>> just compiled, every setting default. The steps to follow are
>> *exactly* these
>>
>> 1. Open the "export selected" tab
>> 2. Click in the "max size" filed.
>> 3. Slowly move the pointer *downwards*
>> 4. As soon as the pointer reaches the "allow upscaling" label just
>> below, the input field loses focus
>> 5. Hover on a image, press a number, and the star rating changes
Ah, yes.  This behaviour is identical on the KDE build that I reported
above.  I did not move the cursor downward before.
Jonathan
> 
> We are aware of this and know why it's happening. We are not sure how to 
> proceed with this though, as grabbing the focus itself is intended (so you 
> can 
> use the arrow keys to change the dropdowns and sliders), but the implication 
> is unwanted. So we have to decide what eggs to break and what omelette to 
> make. Or something like that. :-)
What about a confirmation dialog before DT changes the star rating on a
large number of selected images?  Or an undo stack that remembers star
ratings and can restore them after a mistaken commit?  Alexander's
original report was about losing many decisions on star rating, after all.

> 
>> I have a second, loosely related problem with number keys and stars. I
>> take this opportunity to ask the devs if it's a bug or a feature.
>> Image X has one star. You click on the star, and the star is removed.
>> This makes sense because there is no other way to remove that star.
>> You hover on image X that has one star, you press 1, and the star is
>> removed. This makes no sense, because if you want to remove the star,
>> you can just press 0. It's also frustrating when you see image X
>> suddenly vanish. Is this by design?
> 
> This used to be by design and was changed in the development version. There 
> is 
> still some minor issue left but we are certain that the upcoming release will 
> be intuitive to use in this regard.
> 
>> Yours,
>> Marcello Mamino.
> 
> Tobias
> 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to