2016-11-16 16:22 GMT-03:00 Ulrich Pegelow <ulrich.pege...@tongareva.de>:

> Am 16.11.2016 um 14:27 schrieb Edgardo Hoszowski:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Another option is to adjust the feather with the shift pressed, this way
>> control adjusts the opacity, shift the feather and no key the size, the
>> 3 with the mouse over the shape+feather. This can be useful when the
>> feather is very small or the shape is very small, in both cases is
>> difficult to select the area to adjust, or at least it is for me.
>>
>
> I like that idea! A quick implementation can be found in PR #1354. Please
> test and report back.
>
>
I've done some quick testing:

-circle

shift adjusts the feather anywhere
control adjusts the opacity anywhere
no key adjusts the size on the shape and the feather on the feather, I
think it will be better to adjust the size with the mouse anywhere on the
shape

-ellipse

same as circle, even when on a node

-path

same as circle, but when on a node or segment the zoom is updated instead
of the size, opacity or feather (I mean, instead of adjusting the shape the
image is zoomed)

-brush

I don't use it much, so maybe I just don't understand how it works, but if
it can follow the same logic as the others shapes it would be great. Right
now it sems that with no keys it adjusts the size+feather if the mouse is
on the feather, if on a segment it adjusts the size but the feather is
reduced. It also seems that the step to adjust the size is different that
the one for the circle and ellipse.
When adding a new brush no keys adjusts the size and keeps the feather the
same. Shift adjusts the size but the feather changes, to be more exact, the
outside circle remains the same, and that has the effect of change the size
of the feather.

sorry about my english, if this isn't clear feel free to ask and I'll try
to explain it better.


> Ulrich
>
>
>

___________________________________________________________________________
darktable developer mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org

Reply via email to