On 23 March 2014 19:28, Iain Buclaw <ibuc...@gdcproject.org> wrote: > On 23 March 2014 09:31, Johannes Pfau <nos...@example.com> wrote: >> Am Sat, 22 Mar 2014 14:50:22 -0700 >> schrieb Brad Roberts <bra...@puremagic.com>: >> >>> On 3/22/14, 12:02 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote: >>> > On 22 March 2014 18:20, Johannes Pfau <nos...@example.com> wrote: >>> >> See >>> >> https://d.puremagic.com/test-results/test_data.ghtml?projectid=2&runid=62582&logid=13 >>> >> >>> >> (Didn't see this in my local tests, it probably needs a complete >>> >> gdc rebuild to happen) >>> > >>> > Hmm, didn't see that either. >>> >>> Has the minimum base gcc version moved forward again? >> >> I don't think that's the case here, at least there's no obvious change >> that could require a newer snapshot. >> > > In this case, it's a GCC GC bug. > > Fix incoming.
Still failing with a second unrelated issue. Looks like wrong code sent to back-end (trying to compile an ERROR_MARK) - I probably exposed a couple wrong handling of errors in the backend through some refactoring. What I might end up doing is submitting a new visitor to walk all trees and assert if an error expression is found, that at least safe guards me from having to put in workarounds to handle junk codegen. :-)
