I'm not at all concerned about space, and not sure why most developers would be. Assuming that the GDC changes were done on a non-master branch, and that master reflects the GCC master, then seeing what the GDC changes are would be a typical git operation: git diff master..GDC.

But I can deal with a json config file if necessary. Even better / easier, would be a file with a single line that is the name of the file that should exist, ie:

-----
gcc-4.9-20131201.tar.bz2
-----

I don't mind updating the tester as it stands today, but I kinda need to _know_ it needs to be updated. Waiting for things to fail, waiting for someone to notice, and waiting for someone to diagnose it as being 'too old' all sucks. :)

If the GDC repo contained 3 branches, GDC-4.7, GDC-4.8, and GDC-4.9, having the auto-tester work on them would be _trivial_. I could enable that right now. It takes less than 5 minutes to do for new DMD branches.

On 3/23/14, 2:31 AM, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Am Sat, 22 Mar 2014 14:50:22 -0700
schrieb Brad Roberts <bra...@puremagic.com>:

On 3/22/14, 12:02 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 22 March 2014 18:20, Johannes Pfau <nos...@example.com> wrote:
See
https://d.puremagic.com/test-results/test_data.ghtml?projectid=2&runid=62582&logid=13

(Didn't see this in my local tests, it probably needs a complete
gdc rebuild to happen)

Hmm, didn't see that either.

Has the minimum base gcc version moved forward again?

I don't think that's the case here, at least there's no obvious change
that could require a newer snapshot.

Why isn't the
GDC repo a fork of gcc rather than depend on a tarball to apply on
top of?  Currently the auto-testers are using this snapshot:
4.9-20131201.


The GCC sources are quite big, even bigger as a git repo with history
so I'd like to keep the GDC sources separated (this way it's also easier
to see GDC changes vs normal GCC code).

But I understand that it's probably quite annoying for you to update
the snapshots manually.

How about this: We add a gcc.json file to the root folder in the git
repository (for every branch). gcc.json would look like this:
{
     "base-version":"4.9",
     "snapshot": "20131201"
}

If snapshot is present and non-empty a snapshot has to be used.
Otherwise all stable releases should work, e.g.
{
     "base-version":"4.8",
     "snapshot": ""
}

would work with 4.8.0, 4.8.1, 4.8.2, ...
We then sync the snapshot field in gcc.json to the snapshot we're
using locally.

Reply via email to