On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 06:36:53PM -0400, Arnold G. Reinhold wrote: [..] > > If you read the language carefully, you will see that 1201g only > permits *circumvention* as part of cryptographic research (and then > only under limited circumstances). There is nothing in the law that > allows publication of results. > > Even the recent Shamir, et. al. paper on RC4 and WEP could arguably > violate DMCA. WEP could be considered a TPM since it protects > copyrighted works (e.g. e-mail). More importantly RC4 could be used > in some other copy protection system that we don't know about Like an Adobe product- PDF uses RC4 for it's "password protection". Eric
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism David Honig
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism mmotyka
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism Eugene Leitl
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism Eugene Leitl
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism David Jablon
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism Eric Murray
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism mmotyka
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism georgemw
- Re: CDR: Re: Criminalizing cry... Matt Beland
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism John Gilmore
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism Morlock Elloi
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism Alan
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism Bill Stewart
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism Ben Laurie
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism Alan Olsen
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism Rick Smith at Secure Computing