On 27 Jul 2001, at 17:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > George wrote : > As for Mr. Felton's run-in with this abomination, did he sign any sort > of contract with the music guys to get the materials he needed to do his > work? That might change how we view his situation relative to DMCA. > > Mike > > Well, maybe. As I recall, one of the things mentioned in the complaint is that he violated the click-through license agreement by publishing his results. My understanding is that it has not been thoroughly resolved how binding these things are. I think it's only in Dilbert that you can click on one of these without reading it and wind up as Bill Gates' towelboy, but IANAL. ObPuzzle: You are in a room with three monkeys. One has a banana, one has a stick, one has nothing. Which primate is the smartest? George
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism David Honig
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism mmotyka
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism Eugene Leitl
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism Eugene Leitl
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism David Jablon
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism Eric Murray
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism mmotyka
- Re: CDR: Re: Criminalizing crypto ... georgemw
- Re: CDR: Re: Criminalizing cry... Matt Beland
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism John Gilmore
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism Morlock Elloi
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism Alan
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism Bill Stewart
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism Ben Laurie
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism Alan Olsen
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism Rick Smith at Secure Computing
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criti... Alan Olsen
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism mmotyka