I've been using 128000 for some time, as this sort of problem has arisen
in the past. The overhead looks negligible. Also, it seems like long
message-id's sometimes get munged at lne.com just enough to fool formail.
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
-Brian
On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Eric Murray wrote:
> I've been seeing some duplicate messages from some of the CDRs.
>
> I suspect that the massive increase in traffic has caused
> one or more CDRs to overflow their procmail msgid cache.
> I have been using formail -D 12800 msgid.cache
> (cache size = 1280). Should we raise that?
>
> Eric