Re: police IR searches to Supremes

[David Honig]

At 06:52 AM 9/27/00 -0400, Sampo A Syreeni wrote:
>Well, I think that as long as a conventional photograph is taken from a
>public place, it does not constitute a punishable breach of privacy. What's
>so very different about doing the same thing with IR?

So if you use a different wavelength you can image people through walls.
That should be useful for determining who is committing illegal sexual
acts under cover of optically opaque walls.  Its just a different
wavelength, after all.