https://www.perplexity.ai/search/how-would-i-make-or-use-a-3x3-pSbchMbWSwCmpAfC7HhTVA#5
<img src="https://r2cdn.perplexity.ai/pplx-full-logo-primary-dark%402x.png"; style="height:64px;margin-right:32px"/> # 3x3 Matrix Class in Scheme and Why Quaternions Work ## Creating a 3x3 Matrix Class in Scheme Scheme offers several approaches for implementing a 3x3 matrix class, each with distinct advantages depending on your needs. ### **SRFI-9 Record Types Approach (Recommended)** The most structured approach uses SRFI-9's `define-record-type`, which provides type safety and clear semantics:[^1_1][^1_2][^1_3] ```scheme (define-record-type matrix3x3 (make-matrix3x3 m00 m01 m02 m10 m11 m12 m20 m21 m22) matrix3x3? (m00 matrix3x3-m00 set-matrix3x3-m00!) (m01 matrix3x3-m01 set-matrix3x3-m01!) (m02 matrix3x3-m02 set-matrix3x3-m02!) (m10 matrix3x3-m10 set-matrix3x3-m10!) (m11 matrix3x3-m11 set-matrix3x3-m11!) (m12 matrix3x3-m12 set-matrix3x3-m12!) (m20 matrix3x3-m20 set-matrix3x3-m20!) (m21 matrix3x3-m21 set-matrix3x3-m21!) (m22 matrix3x3-m22 set-matrix3x3-m22!)) ``` This creates a constructor `make-matrix3x3`, a type predicate `matrix3x3?`, accessors for each element, and mutators for modifying elements.[^1_3] ### **Vector-Based Approach (More Efficient)** For computational efficiency, vectors provide compact storage and easy mathematical operations:[^1_4] ```scheme (define (make-matrix3x3-vector . elements) (if (= (length elements) 9) (list->vector elements) (error "Matrix3x3 requires exactly 9 elements"))) (define (matrix3x3-ref mat row col) (vector-ref mat (+ (* row 3) col))) (define (matrix3x3-multiply mat1 mat2) (let ((result (make-vector 9 0))) (do ((i 0 (+ i 1))) ((= i 3)) (do ((j 0 (+ j 1))) ((= j 3)) (let ((sum 0)) (do ((k 0 (+ k 1))) ((= k 3)) (set! sum (+ sum (* (matrix3x3-ref mat1 i k) (matrix3x3-ref mat2 k j))))) (matrix3x3-set! result i j sum)))) result)) ``` This approach stores the 9 matrix elements in a single vector using row-major order, making matrix operations more straightforward to implement.[^1_5] ### **Closure-Based Object Approach** For object-oriented behavior, you can use closures to encapsulate both data and methods:[^1_6][^1_7] ```scheme (define (make-matrix3x3-object . elements) (let ((data (list->vector elements))) (lambda (method . args) (case method ((get) (apply matrix3x3-ref data args)) ((multiply) (matrix3x3-multiply data (car args))) ((display) (matrix3x3-display data)))))) ``` This approach combines data and behavior, providing encapsulation similar to traditional object-oriented programming.[^1_8][^1_6] ## Why Quaternions Work for Rotations Quaternions work remarkably well for representing 3D rotations due to several fundamental mathematical properties that make them superior to other rotation representations. ### **Mathematical Foundation** A quaternion is a 4-dimensional number system extending complex numbers, written as $q = w + xi + yj + zk$, where $w$ is the scalar (real) part and $(x, y, z)$ form the vector (imaginary) part[^1_9][^1_10]. For rotations, we use **unit quaternions** where $|q| = 1$. ### **Geometric Interpretation** The key insight is that a unit quaternion encodes rotation information as: $q = \cos\frac{\theta}{2} + \sin\frac{\theta}{2}\mathbf{u}$ where $\theta$ is the rotation angle and $\mathbf{u}$ is the unit rotation axis. This is fundamentally different from rotation matrices - instead of storing 9 values with 6 constraints, quaternions store the essential rotation information directly.[^1_11][^1_9] ### **Why They Work So Well** **1. Efficient Composition**: Quaternion multiplication naturally composes rotations. If you want to apply rotation $q_1$ followed by $q_2$, the result is simply $q_2 q_1$. This is much more efficient than multiplying 3×3 matrices.[^1_9] **2. No Singularities**: Unlike Euler angles, which suffer from gimbal lock, quaternions have no singular configurations. They can represent any 3D rotation smoothly.[^1_12] **3. Compact Representation**: A quaternion uses only 4 values compared to 9 for a rotation matrix, while still avoiding the ambiguities of 3-parameter representations like Euler angles.[^1_11][^1_12] **4. The Rotation Formula**: The magic happens in how quaternions rotate vectors. For a vector $\mathbf{v}$ and unit quaternion $q$, the rotated vector is: $\mathbf{v}' = q\mathbf{v}q^*$ where $q^*$ is the quaternion conjugate. This formula elegantly captures 3D rotation through 4D quaternion algebra.[^1_13][^1_12] ### **Double Cover Property** Quaternions exhibit a "double cover" of rotation space - both $q$ and $-q$ represent the same rotation. This 720° periodicity (compared to 360° for angles) is actually an advantage, providing smooth interpolation paths for animation and avoiding discontinuities.[^1_14][^1_12][^1_9] ### **Practical Advantages** The quaternion representation excels in several practical areas: - **Smooth Interpolation**: Spherical linear interpolation (SLERP) between quaternions produces smooth, natural rotation paths[^1_12] - **Numerical Stability**: Less prone to accumulation of floating-point errors compared to matrix operations[^1_15] - **Gimbal Lock Free**: No singular orientations that plague Euler angle representations[^1_12] - **Efficient Composition**: Quaternion multiplication is computationally cheaper than matrix multiplication for combining rotations[^1_15] ### **The Deep Reason** Fundamentally, quaternions work because they provide a natural algebraic structure that mirrors the geometry of 3D rotations. The quaternion group structure $q \mapsto qvq^*$ preserves the essential properties of rotations (length, angles, orientation) while avoiding the constraints and singularities of other representations. They're not just a computational convenience - they reveal the underlying mathematical structure of 3D rotational symmetry.[^1_13][^1_9] The success of quaternions demonstrates how finding the right mathematical abstraction can make complex problems dramatically simpler to work with, which aligns perfectly with Scheme's philosophy of elegant, powerful abstractions. <span style="display:none">[^1_16][^1_17][^1_18][^1_19][^1_20][^1_21][^1_22][^1_23][^1_24][^1_25][^1_26][^1_27][^1_28][^1_29][^1_30][^1_31][^1_32][^1_33][^1_34][^1_35][^1_36][^1_37][^1_38][^1_39][^1_40][^1_41][^1_42][^1_43][^1_44][^1_45][^1_46][^1_47][^1_48][^1_49][^1_50][^1_51][^1_52]</span> <div align="center">⁂</div> [^1_1]: https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-9/srfi-9.html [^1_2]: https://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/projects/s48/snapshot/0.55/manual/s48manual_42.html [^1_3]: https://www.scheme.com/tspl4/records.html [^1_4]: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66076737/scheme-matrix-operation-accumulate [^1_5]: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52184095/matrix-multiplication-in-scheme-list-of-lists [^1_6]: https://homes.cs.aau.dk/~normark/prog3-03/html/notes/oop-scheme_themes-classes-objects-sec.html [^1_7]: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2954642/methods-and-properties-in-scheme-is-oop-possible-in-scheme [^1_8]: https://docs.scheme.org/guide/classes/ [^1_9]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternions_and_spatial_rotation [^1_10]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternion [^1_11]: https://lisyarus.github.io/blog/posts/introduction-to-quaternions.html [^1_12]: https://www.mathworks.com/help/fusion/ug/rotations-orientation-and-quaternions.html [^1_13]: https://graphics.stanford.edu/courses/cs348a-17-winter/Papers/quaternion.pdf [^1_14]: https://www.reddit.com/r/GraphicsProgramming/comments/170nusj/can_someone_explain_quaternions/ [^1_15]: https://danceswithcode.net/engineeringnotes/quaternions/quaternions.html [^1_16]: https://www.studocu.com/in/document/university-of-madras/computer-science/c-programming-ex-no-6-9-matrix-and-shape-class-implementation/134126889 [^1_17]: https://askfilo.com/user-question-answers-smart-solutions/give-a-c-program-for-3x3-matrix-multiplication-given-2-3332383138313530 [^1_18]: https://www.mathworks.com/help/matlab/math/sparse-matrix-operations.html [^1_19]: https://www.techgeekbuzz.com/blog/program-to-calculate-3x3-matrix-multiplication/ [^1_20]: https://web.stanford.edu/~wfsharpe/mia/mat/mia_mat2.htm [^1_21]: https://www.w3resource.com/c-programming-exercises/array/c-array-exercise-18.php [^1_22]: https://personal.math.vt.edu/gmatthews/sMatDot.pdf [^1_23]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjMuIxRvygQ [^1_24]: https://hunteye.blogspot.com/2021/05/write-program-in-c-to-input-and-print.html [^1_25]: https://www.scheme.com/tspl4/examples.html [^1_26]: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65359775/how-to-build-3x3-translation-matrix-in-c [^1_27]: https://calcworkshop.com/matrix-algebra/matrix-operations-and-determinants/ [^1_28]: https://people.eecs.ku.edu/~jrmiller/cryph/pvsm/Matrix3x3.html [^1_29]: https://codeburst.io/matrix-operations-in-functional-js-e3463f36b160 [^1_30]: https://docs.scheme.org/schintro/schintro_133.html [^1_31]: https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/5b8yu6/eli5_what_do_quaternions_represent_and_why_do/ [^1_32]: https://www.cs.utah.edu/flux/papers/mod_scheme.html [^1_33]: https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/technical-articles/dont-get-lost-in-deep-space-understanding-quaternions/ [^1_34]: https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Scheme_Programming/Record_Types [^1_35]: https://www.cs.cmu.edu/Groups/AI/html/faqs/lang/scheme/part1/faq-doc-6.html [^1_36]: https://practical-scheme.net/gauche/man/gauche-refe/Record-types.html [^1_37]: https://www.reddit.com/r/scheme/comments/bzismd/how_do_i_create_objects_in_scheme/ [^1_38]: https://mdhughes.tech/2019/04/22/scheme-record-to-recordtype/ [^1_39]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object-oriented_programming [^1_40]: http://www.gnu.org/software/mit-scheme/documentation/stable/mit-scheme-ref/define_002drecord_002dtype-_0028SRFI-9_0029.html [^1_41]: https://www.scheme.com/tspl2d/examples.html [^1_42]: http://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~bh/ssch23/vectors.html [^1_43]: http://www.algebra.uni-linz.ac.at/people/mkauers/publications/kauers22e.pdf [^1_44]: https://www.scribd.com/document/480440325/Matrix-Vector-Multiplication-using-Falk-Scheme [^1_45]: https://www.isc-hpc.com/download/poster/post107ondemand0 [^1_46]: https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/pc3lx/quaternions_geometric_interpretation_question/ [^1_47]: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045790622005225 [^1_48]: https://probablydance.com/2017/08/05/intuitive-quaternions/ [^1_49]: https://www.uobabylon.edu.iq/eprints/publication_3_14973_1586.pdf [^1_50]: https://dl.acm.org/doi/fullHtml/10.1145/3472456.3472493 [^1_51]: https://courses.grainger.illinois.edu/cs554/fa2015/notes/05_products.pdf [^1_52]: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.08009 --- ## Vectorized Math in Scheme and Understanding Quaternion Half-Angles ### Vectorized Operations in Scheme Scheme offers several strategies to reduce interpreter overhead for numerical operations, particularly through specialized numeric types and bytevector operations. **Flonum Vectors and Operations** The most effective approach uses **flonum vectors** (`flvector`), which store floating-point numbers compactly without boxing. These specialized vectors reduce memory allocation by approximately 50% compared to generic vectors and enable the compiler to generate more efficient machine code.[^2_1][^2_2][^2_3] ```scheme ;; Racket/Guile flonum operations (require scheme/flonum) ;; Create flonum vector (define v (flvector 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0)) ;; Flonum-specific operations (avoid boxing) (fl+ (flvector-ref v 0) (flvector-ref v 1)) ; No allocation (fl* (flvector-ref v 2) 2.0) ;; Unsafe operations (even faster, no bounds checking) (require scheme/unsafe/ops) (unsafe-fl+ (unsafe-flvector-ref v 0) 1.2) ``` **Bytevectors for Bulk Operations** Bytevectors provide low-level access to packed numeric data, enabling SIMD-like operations:[^2_4][^2_5][^2_6] ```scheme ;; Store floats as bytevectors (R6RS) (define bv (make-bytevector 32)) ; 8 floats * 4 bytes ;; Access as 32-bit floats (bytevector-ieee-single-native-set! bv 0 3.14) (bytevector-ieee-single-native-ref bv 0) ;; Efficient for batch operations (define (vector-add! dest src1 src2 n) (do ((i 0 (+ i 4))) ((>= i n)) (bytevector-ieee-single-native-set! dest i (+ (bytevector-ieee-single-native-ref src1 i) (bytevector-ieee-single-native-ref src2 i))))) ``` **Key Performance Strategies** According to benchmarks, these approaches eliminate 99.8% of flonum allocations in numerically intensive code:[^2_7] 1. **Use `flvector` instead of generic vectors** for numeric arrays 2. **Apply flonum-specific operations** (`fl+`, `fl*`, `fl<`) to avoid type checking 3. **Leverage unsafe operations** when bounds are guaranteed 4. **Batch operations** to reduce loop overhead 5. **Keep flonums in registers** by chaining flonum operations together The combination of flonum vectors with JIT compilation can achieve 3-8x speedups over generic vector operations.[^2_8][^2_9] ### Why Quaternions Use Half-Angles: The Double Application **The Core Insight: Quaternions Apply Twice** Quaternions use half-angles because the rotation formula $\mathbf{v}' = q\mathbf{v}q^*$ applies the rotation **twice**. This "sandwich product" multiplies the quaternion on both sides, effectively doubling the rotation angle.[^2_10][^2_11][^2_12] When you multiply a vector by a quaternion from the left ($q\mathbf{v}$), you get a partial rotation. Then multiplying by the conjugate from the right ($\cdot q^*$) completes the rotation in the same direction. Since each multiplication contributes to the rotation, the total rotation is doubled:[^2_11] - First multiplication ($q\mathbf{v}$): rotates by $\theta/2$ - Second multiplication ($\cdot q^*$): rotates by another $\theta/2$ - **Total rotation: $\theta/2 + \theta/2 = \theta$** This is why we encode the quaternion as $q = \cos\frac{\theta}{2} + \sin\frac{\theta}{2}\mathbf{u}$ — we need **half** the desired angle because it gets applied **twice**.[^2_13][^2_10] ### Complex Numbers: The 2D Equivalent **Complex numbers are the 2-space equivalent of quaternions**. A unit complex number $z = \cos\theta + i\sin\theta$ rotates 2D vectors through angle $\theta$.[^2_14][^2_15][^2_16] **Key Difference from Quaternions:** ```scheme ;; Complex numbers (2D): Single application, FULL angle ;; v' = z · v ;; z = cos(θ) + i·sin(θ) ;; Quaternions (3D): Double application, HALF angle ;; v' = q · v · q* ;; q = cos(θ/2) + sin(θ/2)·axis ``` Complex numbers use the **full angle** because rotation requires only **one multiplication**: $\mathbf{v}' = z\mathbf{v}$. There's no conjugate multiplication, so no doubling effect.[^2_15][^2_17] | Property | Complex Numbers (2D) | Quaternions (3D) | | :-- | :-- | :-- | | Formula | $\mathbf{v}' = z\mathbf{v}$ | $\mathbf{v}' = q\mathbf{v}q^*$ | | Applications | 1 | 2 (sandwich) | | Angle | Full $\theta$ | Half $\theta/2$ | | Components | 2 (real, imaginary) | 4 (scalar, 3 imaginary) | | Double cover | No | Yes | ### Component Arithmetic Proof Let's prove quaternions work by rotating $\mathbf{v} = (1, 0, 0)$ by 90° around the z-axis. **Setup:** - Desired rotation: $\theta = 90°$ - Half-angle: $\theta/2 = 45°$ - Quaternion: $q = \cos(45°) + \sin(45°)\mathbf{k} = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2} + \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}\mathbf{k}$ - Vector as quaternion: $p = 0 + 1\mathbf{i} + 0\mathbf{j} + 0\mathbf{k}$ **Step 1: Compute $qp$** Using quaternion multiplication $(w_1 + x_1\mathbf{i} + y_1\mathbf{j} + z_1\mathbf{k})(w_2 + x_2\mathbf{i} + y_2\mathbf{j} + z_2\mathbf{k})$: $qp = \left(\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2} + 0\mathbf{i} + 0\mathbf{j} + \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}\mathbf{k}\right)(0 + 1\mathbf{i} + 0\mathbf{j} + 0\mathbf{k})$ Computing each component: - Real: $\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}(0) - 0(1) - 0(0) - \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}(0) = 0$ - $\mathbf{i}$: $\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}(1) + 0(0) + 0(0) - \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}(0) = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}$ - $\mathbf{j}$: $\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}(0) - 0(0) + 0(0) + \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}(1) = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}$ - $\mathbf{k}$: $\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}(0) + 0(0) - 0(1) + \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}(0) = 0$ Result: $qp = 0 + \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}\mathbf{i} + \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}\mathbf{j} + 0\mathbf{k}$ **Step 2: Conjugate** $q^* = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2} - \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}\mathbf{k}$ **Step 3: Compute $(qp)q^*$** $\left(0 + \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}\mathbf{i} + \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}\mathbf{j} + 0\mathbf{k}\right)\left(\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2} - \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}\mathbf{k}\right)$ Computing components: - Real: $0 - \frac{1}{2}(0) - \frac{1}{2}(0) - 0(\frac{1}{2}) = 0$ ✓ - $\mathbf{i}$: $0 + \frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}) + \frac{1}{2}(0)(\frac{-1}{\sqrt{2}}) - 0(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}) = 0$ ✓ - $\mathbf{j}$: $0 - \frac{1}{2}(0) + \frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}) + 0(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}) = 1$ ✓ - $\mathbf{k}$: $0 + \frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}) - \frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}) + 0 = 0$ ✓ **Final result: $\mathbf{v}' = (0, 1, 0)$** This perfectly matches a 90° rotation of $(1, 0, 0)$ around the z-axis! The half-angle in the quaternion (45°) gets applied twice through the sandwich product to produce the full 90° rotation.[^2_12][^2_11] <span style="display:none">[^2_18][^2_19][^2_20][^2_21][^2_22][^2_23][^2_24][^2_25][^2_26][^2_27][^2_28][^2_29][^2_30][^2_31][^2_32][^2_33][^2_34][^2_35][^2_36][^2_37][^2_38][^2_39]</span> <div align="center">⁂</div> [^2_1]: https://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/2009-December/037286.html [^2_2]: https://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/ftpdir/scheme-7.4/doc-html/user_5.html [^2_3]: http://web.mit.edu/jwalden/Public/891/scheme/good-scheme/lib/mit-scheme/doc/mit-scheme-user/Flonum-arithmetic.html [^2_4]: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Bytevectors-as-Integers.html [^2_5]: http://marcomaggi.github.io/docs/vicare-scheme.html/stdlib-bytevector.html [^2_6]: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Bytevectors-and-Integer-Lists.html [^2_7]: http://practical-scheme.net/docs/DLS2008.pdf [^2_8]: https://sumofbytes.com/blog/harnessing-the-power-of-simd-boosting-performance-with-vectorization [^2_9]: https://objectcomputing.com/resources/publications/sett/december-2016-performance-optimization-on-modern-processor-architecture-through-vectorization [^2_10]: https://blog.hamaluik.ca/posts/quaternions-as-four-dimensional-complex-numbers/ [^2_11]: https://probablydance.com/2017/08/05/intuitive-quaternions/ [^2_12]: https://www.reedbeta.com/blog/why-quaternions-double-cover/ [^2_13]: https://www.gathering4gardner.org/g4g13gift/math/BickfordNeil-GiftExchange-WhyDoTheUnitQuaternionsDoubleCoverTheSpaceOfRotations-G4G13.pdf [^2_14]: https://jingnanshi.com/blog/from_complex_numbers_to_quaternions.html [^2_15]: http://www.euclideanspace.com/maths/algebra/realNormedAlgebra/complex/transforms/ [^2_16]: https://www.reddit.com/r/askmath/comments/5mqq8i/can_you_use_2d_vectors_as_complex_numbers_for/ [^2_17]: https://blog.demofox.org/2014/12/27/using-imaginary-numbers-to-rotate-2d-vectors/ [^2_18]: https://celerdata.com/glossary/how-to-boost-computational-speed-with-vectorization [^2_19]: https://www.tigerdata.com/blog/teaching-postgres-new-tricks-simd-vectorization-for-faster-analytical-queries [^2_20]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternions_and_spatial_rotation [^2_21]: https://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/5/srfi-207 [^2_22]: https://www.reddit.com/r/mathematics/comments/ttnn9v/complex_numbers_and_quaternions/ [^2_23]: https://www.thepulsar.be/article/quaternion-based-rotations/ [^2_24]: https://stackoverflow.blog/2020/07/08/improving-performance-with-simd-intrinsics-in-three-use-cases/ [^2_25]: https://www.scheme.com/tspl4/io.html [^2_26]: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/simd [^2_27]: https://www.scheme.com/tspl4/objects.html [^2_28]: https://lcamtuf.substack.com/p/complex-numbers-2-a-world-in-3d [^2_29]: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35091979/why-is-vectorization-faster-in-general-than-loops [^2_30]: https://man.scheme.org/bytevector-u16-set!.3scm [^2_31]: https://www.reddit.com/r/askmath/comments/1bghbe8/why_do_quaternions_use_half_angles_for_the_form/ [^2_32]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8maGEyoRjo [^2_33]: https://github.com/cisco/ChezScheme/issues/248 [^2_34]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotation_matrix [^2_35]: https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-63/srfi-63.html [^2_36]: https://www.gamedev.net/forums/topic/698840-quaternion-why-divide-angle-by-2/ [^2_37]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIQmq1wOjnc [^2_38]: https://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/5/math [^2_39]: https://raw.org/proof/quaternion-from-two-vectors/ --- ## Performing Multiple Arithmetic Operations in Scheme Scheme provides several powerful techniques to reduce interpreter overhead and perform multiple arithmetic operations efficiently within single function calls. ### **Inline Function Declarations** The most direct approach is using `define-inline` to instruct the compiler to substitute function bodies at call sites, eliminating function call overhead entirely:[^3_1][^3_2] ```scheme ;; Chez Scheme, Racket (define-inline (dot-product x1 y1 z1 x2 y2 z2) (+ (* x1 x2) (* y1 y2) (* z1 z2))) ;; Compiler expands this to a single expression - no function call! (dot-product 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0) ``` The compiler replaces the call with the actual arithmetic operations, allowing further optimization like constant folding and dead code elimination.[^3_1] ### **Flonum-Specific Operations** Using flonum vectors and operations bypasses generic arithmetic dispatch and eliminates boxing/unboxing:[^3_3][^3_4] ```scheme (require scheme/flonum) ;; Generic (slow - type checks each operation) (+ (* x1 x2) (* y1 y2) (* z1 z2)) ;; Flonum operations (fast - specialized for floats) (fl+ (fl* x1 x2) (fl+ (fl* y1 y2) (fl* z1 z2))) ;; Unsafe operations (fastest - no bounds checking) (require scheme/unsafe/ops) (unsafe-fl+ (unsafe-fl* x1 x2) (unsafe-fl+ (unsafe-fl* y1 y2) (unsafe-fl* z1 z2))) ``` This eliminates approximately 99.8% of flonum allocations in numeric code.[^3_3] ### **Expression Chaining with Let** Chain operations in single expressions to avoid intermediate function calls: ```scheme (define (magnitude-fast v) (let ((x (vector-ref v 0)) (y (vector-ref v 1)) (z (vector-ref v 2))) ;; All arithmetic in one expression (sqrt (+ (* x x) (* y y) (* z z))))) ``` ### **Compile-Time Macros** Macros expand into compound expressions at compile-time, creating single-call operations:[^3_1] ```scheme (define-syntax vector-add (syntax-rules () ((vector-add v1 v2) (vector (+ (vector-ref v1 0) (vector-ref v2 0)) (+ (vector-ref v1 1) (vector-ref v2 1)) (+ (vector-ref v1 2) (vector-ref v2 2)))))) ;; Expands at compile time - no runtime dispatch (vector-add v1 v2) ``` ### **Optimization Example: Quaternion Multiplication** ```scheme ;; FAST: Inline + flonum operations + let-binding (define-inline (quat-multiply q1 q2) (let ((w1 (flvector-ref q1 0)) (x1 (flvector-ref q1 1)) (y1 (flvector-ref q1 2)) (z1 (flvector-ref q1 3)) (w2 (flvector-ref q2 0)) (x2 (flvector-ref q2 1)) (y2 (flvector-ref q2 2)) (z2 (flvector-ref q2 3))) (flvector (fl- (fl- (fl- (fl* w1 w2) (fl* x1 x2)) (fl* y1 y2)) (fl* z1 z2)) (fl+ (fl+ (fl+ (fl* w1 x2) (fl* x1 w2)) (fl* y1 z2)) (fl- 0.0 (fl* z1 y2))) (fl+ (fl+ (fl- (fl* w1 y2) (fl* x1 z2)) (fl* y1 w2)) (fl* z1 x2)) (fl+ (fl- (fl+ (fl* w1 z2) (fl* x1 y2)) (fl* y1 x2)) (fl* z1 w2))))) ``` This combines all techniques for maximum performance - all 16 multiplications and 12 additions execute as a single optimized unit.[^3_1] ## Symbolic Derivation: Quaternion Sandwich Product ↔ Axis-Angle I've derived the complete symbolic relationship between quaternion rotation and Rodrigues' axis-angle formula. Here's the key result: ### **Starting from Quaternion** Given quaternion $q = \cos\frac{\theta}{2} + \sin\frac{\theta}{2}\hat{u}$ and vector $\mathbf{v}$, expanding the sandwich product $q\mathbf{v}q^*$ symbolically: **Step 1:** Expand $q\mathbf{v}$ where $\mathbf{v} = 0 + \vec{v}$: $q\mathbf{v} = (-\vec{q} \cdot \vec{v}) + (w\vec{v} + \vec{q} \times \vec{v})$ **Step 2:** Multiply by conjugate $q^* = w - \vec{q}$ and apply the BAC-CAB vector identity: $\vec{v}' = 2(\vec{q} \cdot \vec{v})\vec{q} + (w^2 - |\vec{q}|^2)\vec{v} + 2w(\vec{q} \times \vec{v})$ **Step 3:** Substitute $w = \cos\frac{\theta}{2}$ and $\vec{q} = \sin\frac{\theta}{2}\hat{u}$, using double-angle formulas: - $w^2 - |\vec{q}|^2 = 2\cos^2\frac{\theta}{2} - 1 = \cos\theta$ - $2\sin^2\frac{\theta}{2} = 1 - \cos\theta$ - $2\cos\frac{\theta}{2}\sin\frac{\theta}{2} = \sin\theta$ **Final Result:** $\boxed{\vec{v}' = q\mathbf{v}q^* = \cos\theta\,\vec{v} + [1 - \cos\theta](\hat{u} \cdot \vec{v})\hat{u} + \sin\theta(\hat{u} \times \vec{v})}$ This is exactly **Rodrigues' rotation formula**![^3_5][^3_6][^3_7] ### **Reverse: Axis-Angle to Quaternion** Given Rodrigues' formula for rotation by angle $\theta$ around axis $\hat{u}$, the quaternion that produces this rotation is: $\boxed{q = \cos\frac{\theta}{2} + \sin\frac{\theta}{2}\hat{u}}$ ### **Why Half-Angles Are Necessary** The symbolic derivation reveals the deep reason: 1. The sandwich product applies the quaternion **twice** (left and right multiplication) 2. Double-angle formulas emerge naturally from the algebra: - $2\cos^2\frac{\theta}{2} - 1 = \cos\theta$ - $2\sin\frac{\theta}{2}\cos\frac{\theta}{2} = \sin\theta$ 3. The quaternion algebra structure **requires** half-angle encoding because the sandwich product **doubles** the rotation effect[^3_8][^3_9][^3_10] This isn't arbitrary - it's a mathematical necessity arising from the structure of quaternion multiplication itself.[^3_11][^3_7] **Bijection Summary:** | Representation | Formula | | :-- | :-- | | **Axis-Angle** | $\vec{v}' = \cos\theta\,\vec{v} + [1-\cos\theta](\hat{u} \cdot \vec{v})\hat{u} + \sin\theta(\hat{u} \times \vec{v})$ | | **Quaternion** | $q = \cos\frac{\theta}{2} + \sin\frac{\theta}{2}\hat{u}$ where $\vec{v}' = q\mathbf{v}q^*$ | Both encode identical 3D rotations through different algebraic structures.[^3_12][^3_13][^3_5] <span style="display:none">[^3_14][^3_15][^3_16][^3_17][^3_18][^3_19][^3_20][^3_21][^3_22][^3_23][^3_24][^3_25][^3_26][^3_27][^3_28][^3_29][^3_30][^3_31][^3_32][^3_33][^3_34][^3_35][^3_36][^3_37][^3_38][^3_39]</span> <div align="center">⁂</div> [^3_1]: https://guenchi.github.io/Scheme/doc/Fast and Effective Procedure Inlining.pdf [^3_2]: https://www.cs.utexas.edu/ftp/garbage/cs345/schintro-v14/schintro_142.html [^3_3]: http://practical-scheme.net/docs/DLS2008.pdf [^3_4]: http://web.mit.edu/jwalden/Public/891/scheme/good-scheme/lib/mit-scheme/doc/mit-scheme-user/Flonum-arithmetic.html [^3_5]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternions_and_spatial_rotation [^3_6]: https://www.geometrictools.com/Documentation/RotationRepresentations.pdf [^3_7]: https://graphics.stanford.edu/courses/cs348a-17-winter/Papers/quaternion.pdf [^3_8]: https://akshaychandra.com/blog/2023/quat-rot-op1/ [^3_9]: https://probablydance.com/2017/08/05/intuitive-quaternions/ [^3_10]: https://www.reedbeta.com/blog/why-quaternions-double-cover/ [^3_11]: https://www.clear.rice.edu/comp360/lectures/QuaternionsChina.pdf [^3_12]: https://www.euclideanspace.com/maths/geometry/rotations/conversions/quaternionToAngle/index.htm [^3_13]: https://www.euclideanspace.com/maths/geometry/rotations/conversions/angleToQuaternion/index.htm [^3_14]: https://www.epfl.ch/labs/lap/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/VermaJul09_ArithmeticOptimizationForCustomInstructionSetSynthesis_SASP09.pdf [^3_15]: https://www.reddit.com/r/Assembly_language/comments/15kay6s/does_compiler_inline_functions_written_in/ [^3_16]: https://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~wongwf/papers/cl.pdf [^3_17]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inline_expansion [^3_18]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44142472 [^3_19]: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/cpp/inline-functions-cpp?view=msvc-170 [^3_20]: https://danceswithcode.net/engineeringnotes/quaternions/quaternions.html [^3_21]: http://www.goodmath.org/blog/2011/05/03/the-perils-of-premature-optimization/ [^3_22]: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Inline.html [^3_23]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99r3kS3nWpw [^3_24]: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1095734/how-do-i-use-declarations-type-inline-optimize-in-scheme [^3_25]: https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/c/inline-function-in-c/ [^3_26]: https://matthew-brett.github.io/transforms3d/reference/transforms3d.derivations.html [^3_27]: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0045782522001864 [^3_28]: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1443982/when-do-compilers-inline-functions [^3_29]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conversion_between_quaternions_and_Euler_angles [^3_30]: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11686097/ [^3_31]: https://developer.arm.com/documentation/100748/0611/writing-optimized-code/inlining-functions?lang=en [^3_32]: https://www.reddit.com/r/C_Programming/comments/wws0y9/is_optimizing_functions_easier_when_it_inline/ [^3_33]: https://lxjk.github.io/2016/10/29/A-Different-Way-to-Understand-Quaternion-and-Rotation.html [^3_34]: https://www.reddit.com/r/learnmath/comments/dawfm3/quaternion_sandwich_product_help_please/ [^3_35]: https://wiki.call-cc.org/programming-for-performance [^3_36]: https://faculty.sites.iastate.edu/jia/files/inline-files/quaternion.pdf [^3_37]: https://clarkkromenaker.com/post/gengine-09-quaternions/ [^3_38]: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html [^3_39]: https://www.euclideanspace.com/maths/algebra/clifford/geometry/transforms/sandwich/index.htm --- ## Vectorizing Multiple Operations in Guile You're asking the right question - the previous techniques were about optimizing single number operations, but you want to process **multiple numbers in parallel**. For Guile, this means either calling out to native libraries or using FFI effectively. ### **Using BLAS via FFI (Best Option)** The `guile-ffi-cblas` library provides direct bindings to BLAS, allowing you to process entire arrays in single native calls with internal SIMD optimization:[^4_1] ```scheme (use-modules (ffi cblas)) ;; Process 1000 elements in one BLAS call (define v1 (f64vector 1.0 2.0 3.0 ... )) ; 1000 elements (define v2 (f64vector 5.0 6.0 7.0 ... )) ;; Single call - BLAS handles vectorization internally (ddot v1 v2) ; Dot product of entire vectors ;; Matrix-vector multiply: processes entire matrix (dgemv! 1.0 matrix vec 0.0 result) ``` This approach processes hundreds or thousands of elements per call using highly optimized native code that includes SIMD instructions.[^4_1] ### **Custom C Extensions with SIMD** For operations not covered by BLAS, write Guile C extensions using SIMD intrinsics: ```c // Compiled with -mavx2 #include <libguile.h> #include <immintrin.h> SCM vector_add_avx2(SCM sv1, SCM sv2, SCM sresult) { double *v1 = scm_f64vector_writable_elements(sv1, ...); double *v2 = scm_f64vector_writable_elements(sv2, ...); double *result = scm_f64vector_writable_elements(sresult, ...); // Process 4 doubles per iteration with AVX2 for (size_t i = 0; i < len; i += 4) { __m256d a = _mm256_loadu_pd(&v1[i]); __m256d b = _mm256_loadu_pd(&v2[i]); __m256d sum = _mm256_add_pd(a, b); _mm256_storeu_pd(&result[i], sum); } } ``` This processes 4 double-precision numbers per instruction.[^4_2][^4_3] ### **scheme-bytestructures for Zero-Overhead FFI** The `scheme-bytestructures` library provides zero-overhead access to C data structures:[^4_3] ```scheme (use-modules (bytestructures guile)) ;; Define array matching C memory layout (define-bytestructure-accessors (bs:vector 1000 float64) vec-unwrap vec-ref vec-set!) ;; Call C function that uses SIMD (define process-batch (pointer->procedure void (dynamic-func "process_vectors_simd" libmath) (list '* '* int))) ;; Single call processes 1000 elements (process-batch (vec-unwrap v1) (vec-unwrap v2) 1000) ``` ## The Two-Angle Structure of Rodrigues' Formula You've hit on a profound insight - there **are** two angles in rotation, but they play very different roles! Let me make this explicit with clear labeling. ### **The Two Angles** **1. θ (theta) - Rotation angle around the axis** - Constant for a given rotation operation - This is what quaternions encode: $q = \cos\frac{\theta}{2} + \sin\frac{\theta}{2}\hat{u}$ - Property of the **rotation itself** **2. φ (phi) - Angle between rotation axis and vector** - Varies for each vector being rotated - Determines parallel vs perpendicular components - Property of the **vector being rotated** ### **Explicit Two-Angle Form** The clearest geometric form showing both angles:[^4_4][^4_5][^4_6] $\boxed{\vec{v}' = |\vec{v}|\cos\phi\,\hat{u} + |\vec{v}|\sin\phi[\cos\theta\,\hat{n} + \sin\theta\,\hat{b}]}$ **where:** - $\phi = \arccos(\hat{u} \cdot \hat{v})$ — angle between axis and vector - $\theta$ — rotation angle (constant for the operation) - $\hat{n} = \vec{v}_\perp/|\vec{v}_\perp|$ — unit perpendicular direction - $\hat{b} = \hat{u} \times \hat{n}$ — binormal (completes right-handed frame) ### **Component Breakdown** **Parallel component** (unchanged by rotation): $\vec{v}_\parallel = (\hat{u} \cdot \vec{v})\hat{u} = |\vec{v}|\cos\phi\,\hat{u}$ **Perpendicular component** (rotates in plane): $\vec{v}_\perp = \vec{v} - \vec{v}_\parallel = |\vec{v}|\sin\phi\,\hat{n}$ After rotation by $\theta$: $\vec{v}'_\perp = |\vec{v}|\sin\phi[\cos\theta\,\hat{n} + \sin\theta\,\hat{b}]$ ### **Physical Interpretation** Think in coordinates aligned with the rotation axis $\hat{u}$:[^4_5][^4_6] | Component | Magnitude | Role | | :-- | :-- | :-- | | Along axis ($\hat{u}$) | \$ | \vec{v} | | In rotation plane ($\hat{n}$) | \$ | \vec{v} | | Perpendicular to plane ($\hat{b}$) | \$ | \vec{v} | **Key insight:** - **φ determines HOW MUCH rotates** (the perpendicular component magnitude) - **θ determines BY HOW MUCH it rotates** (the rotation angle) ### **Why Quaternions Only Need θ** You're absolutely right that quaternions only encode θ, not φ! This is because:[^4_7][^4_8] 1. **θ is intrinsic to the rotation** — same for all vectors 2. **φ is intrinsic to each vector** — computed on-the-fly The quaternion sandwich product $q\vec{v}q^*$ automatically: - Decomposes $\vec{v} = \vec{v}_\parallel + \vec{v}_\perp$ (implicitly computing φ) - Keeps $\vec{v}_\parallel$ unchanged - Rotates $\vec{v}_\perp$ by angle θ The angle φ emerges naturally from the quaternion multiplication without needing to be stored! This is the elegance of the quaternion representation - you encode only the rotation parameters (θ and $\hat{u}$), and the vector-dependent geometry (φ) is handled algebraically.[^4_8][^4_9] ### **Understanding Through Trigonometric Identities** The relationship between the standard and two-angle forms relies on these identities:[^4_5] - $2\cos^2\frac{\theta}{2} - 1 = \cos\theta$ (appears in quaternion derivation) - $2\sin^2\frac{\theta}{2} = 1 - \cos\theta$ (appears in parallel component term) - $2\sin\frac{\theta}{2}\cos\frac{\theta}{2} = \sin\theta$ (appears in perpendicular term) These double-angle formulas are why the quaternion half-angle encoding produces the full rotation angle in the final result - the algebraic structure naturally doubles the angle through the sandwich product.[^4_10][^4_11] <span style="display:none">[^4_12][^4_13][^4_14][^4_15][^4_16][^4_17][^4_18][^4_19][^4_20][^4_21][^4_22][^4_23][^4_24][^4_25][^4_26][^4_27][^4_28][^4_29][^4_30][^4_31][^4_32][^4_33][^4_34][^4_35][^4_36][^4_37][^4_38][^4_39][^4_40][^4_41]</span> <div align="center">⁂</div> [^4_1]: https://github.com/lloda/guile-ffi-cblas [^4_2]: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Dynamic-FFI.html [^4_3]: https://vijaymarupudi.com/blog/2022-02-22-bytestructures-guile-library-spotlight.html [^4_4]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rodrigues'_rotation_formula [^4_5]: https://handwiki.org/wiki/Rodrigues'_rotation_formula [^4_6]: https://www.scribd.com/document/466285278/Rodrigues-rotation-formula-Wikipedia-pdf [^4_7]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternions_and_spatial_rotation [^4_8]: https://akshaychandra.com/blog/2023/quat-rot-op1/ [^4_9]: https://graphics.stanford.edu/courses/cs348a-17-winter/Papers/quaternion.pdf [^4_10]: https://probablydance.com/2017/08/05/intuitive-quaternions/ [^4_11]: https://www.reedbeta.com/blog/why-quaternions-double-cover/ [^4_12]: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Vectors.html [^4_13]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L4Aa3oWaaTE [^4_14]: https://andreyor.st/posts/2023-10-18-a-programming-system/ [^4_15]: https://www.cis.upenn.edu/~cis580/Spring2015/Lectures/cis580-08-Quaternion_lecture.pdf [^4_16]: https://www.nongnu.org/nyacc/ffi-help.html [^4_17]: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Vector-Creation.html [^4_18]: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Foreign-Function-Interface.html [^4_19]: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67060343/simd-vectorization-strategies-for-group-by-operations-on-multiple-very-large-da [^4_20]: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094114X15000415 [^4_21]: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/75962245/how-can-i-load-a-foreign-library-using-guile-scheme [^4_22]: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/simd [^4_23]: http://motion.me.ucsb.edu/pdf/2011c-pb.pdf [^4_24]: https://www.libhunt.com/compare-hm-infer-scheme-vs-guile-ffi-cblas [^4_25]: https://johnnysswlab.com/the-messy-reality-of-simd-vector-functions/ [^4_26]: https://web.eecs.umich.edu/~sugih/courses/eecs487/common/notes/rotations.pdf [^4_27]: https://celerdata.com/glossary/single-instruction-multiple-data-simd [^4_28]: https://www.reddit.com/r/learnmath/comments/1ku5bna/how_do_you_geometrically_derive_the_rotation/ [^4_29]: https://nalaginrut.com/archives/2015/03/27/do-some-quick-and-dirty-with-guile-ffi [^4_30]: https://calcworkshop.com/transformations/rotation-rules/ [^4_31]: https://projecteuclid.org/journals/journal-of-geometry-and-symmetry-in-physics/volume-28/issue-none/Vector-Decompositions-of-Rotations/10.7546/jgsp-28-2012-67-103.pdf [^4_32]: https://www.cuemath.com/algebra/rotation-matrix/ [^4_33]: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10491047/fast-array-access-using-racket-ffi [^4_34]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotation_(mathematics) [^4_35]: https://cffi.readthedocs.io/en/latest/using.html [^4_36]: https://mathbitsnotebook.com/Geometry/Transformations/TRRotationNOTOrigin.html [^4_37]: https://users.rust-lang.org/t/how-to-return-byte-array-from-rust-function-to-ffi-c/18136 [^4_38]: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094114X22004293 [^4_39]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zyHyhf78T4Y [^4_40]: https://www.reddit.com/r/love2d/comments/s2l9q7/how_to_do_arrays_with_ffi/ [^4_41]: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1312.0788.pdf --- # Ok! Can you take that interpretation, based on the 3 clear axes you described (parallel - no change in this axis; perpendicular - the direction in the rotation plane that the vector starts in I think?; and binormal - the axis in the rotation plane that the transformation rotates positive angles toward, i think?) and simplify it step-by-step as if optimizing a kernel, to show that quaternions are one of the most appropriate storage representations for efficient 3-space rotation data? (are there any others that are equally efficient?) Perfect! You've got the three-axis interpretation exactly right. Let me show you the complete optimization path from that clear geometric form to quaternions. ## Kernel Optimization: Geometric Form → Quaternions ### Your Three Axes (Correct!) 1. **û (parallel)** - Rotation axis; component **unchanged** 2. **n̂ (perpendicular)** - Initial direction in rotation plane where $\vec{v}_\perp$ starts 3. **b̂ (binormal)** - Direction that positive θ rotates **toward** (û × n̂) ### Step-by-Step Optimization **Step 0: Pure Geometric Form** ```c v' = |v|cos(φ)û + |v|sin(φ)[cos(θ)n̂ + sin(θ)b̂] ``` - **Cost:** 30 ops + arccos + 3 trig + 2 sqrt - **Storage:** 4 floats **Step 1: Eliminate φ angle** ```c v_∥ = (û · v)û v_⊥ = v - v_∥ v' = v_∥ + cos(θ)v_⊥ + sin(θ)(û × v_⊥) ``` - **Cost:** 18 muls + 14 adds + 2 trig - **Savings:** No arccos, no sqrt! **Step 2: Rodrigues' Formula** ```c v' = cos(θ)v + [1-cos(θ)](û·v)û + sin(θ)(û × v) ``` - **Cost:** 18 muls + 11 adds + 2 trig - **Storage:** 4 floats **Step 3: Pre-compute trig** ```c c = cos(θ), s = sin(θ), c' = 1-cos(θ) v' = c·v + c'(û·v)û + s(û × v) ``` - **Cost:** 18 muls + 11 adds (no trig!) - **Storage:** 6 floats **Step 4: Rotation Matrix** ```c R = 3×3 matrix from axis-angle v' = R·v ``` - **Cost:** 9 muls + 6 adds ⭐ **fastest rotation** - **Storage:** 9 floats ⚠️ **2.25× larger** **Step 5: Quaternion** ```c q = cos(θ/2) + sin(θ/2)û v' = v + 2w(q⃗ × v) + 2q⃗ × (q⃗ × v) ``` - **Cost:** 15 muls + 12 adds - **Storage:** 4 floats ⭐ **minimal** **Step 6: Optimized Quaternion** ```c a = 2w² - 1 (pre-compute) v' = a·v + 2(q⃗·v)q⃗ + 2w(q⃗ × v) ``` - **Cost:** 15 muls + 9 adds - **Storage:** 5 floats (4 + 1 pre-computed) ### Performance Comparison | Representation | Storage | Muls | Adds | Why Use It | | :-- | :-- | :-- | :-- | :-- | | **Quaternion** | **4** | **15** | **9-12** | **Best overall** ✅ | | Matrix | 9 | 9 | 6 | Batch same rotation | | Rodrigues | 6 | 18 | 11 | Human-readable | | Euler angles | 3 | ~30 | ~20 | Gimbal lock ❌ | ### Why Quaternions Are Optimal **1. Storage Efficiency** - 4 floats = minimum for 3D rotation + axis - Perfect SIMD alignment (SSE/NEON registers) - Better cache performance than 9-float matrix **2. Composition Speed** - Quaternion multiply: **16 muls + 12 adds** - Matrix multiply: **27 muls + 18 adds** - **40% faster composition!** **3. Numerical Stability** - Single constraint: |q| = 1 - Easy renormalization: `q / sqrt(w²+x²+y²+z²)` - Matrix has 6 orthogonality constraints **4. Interpolation** - SLERP (spherical linear interpolation) is natural - Smooth, constant-velocity rotations - Matrix lerp doesn't preserve rotation **5. No Gimbal Lock** - Can represent all rotations - No singularities like Euler angles ### Alternative Representations **Equally Efficient?** **Rotation Matrix** - Faster rotation (9 vs 15 muls) but 2.25× storage - Use when: Applying **same rotation to many vectors** **Rotor (Geometric Algebra)** - **Isomorphic to quaternions!** Same 4 values, same performance - Different mathematical framework **Not Equally Efficient:** **Exponential Map** (3 values: ω⃗ where |ω⃗| = θ) - Minimal storage, but expensive to apply (matrix exponential) **Dual Quaternions** (8 values) - Handles rotation + translation, but double storage **Euler Angles** (3 values) - Compact but gimbal lock + expensive to apply ### Conclusion Quaternions achieve the **optimal balance**: - ✅ Minimal storage (4 floats) - ✅ Fast rotation (15 muls, competitive) - ✅ Fastest composition (40% better) - ✅ Numerical stability - ✅ Smooth interpolation - ✅ No singularities For general 3D rotation (games, robotics, animation, aerospace), quaternions are the industry standard because they optimize the **entire workflow**, not just single operations! --- # I am thinking people must use quaternions for various uhh orientation transport? purposes like slerping and avoiding gimbal lock, since traditionally this kind of code was optimized for few operations. Also I noticed some needless ops on your steps! How does slerping a quat compare to a matrix or a plain axis angle? Can you write out the axis angle matrix? Excellent catch! You're absolutely right - I had some counting errors. Here's the corrected analysis: ## SLERP: Why Quaternions Dominated You're spot-on - quaternions became popular primarily for **interpolation and orientation tracking**, not just raw rotation speed! ### Quaternion SLERP (Spherical Linear Interpolation) **Algorithm:** 1. Compute angle: $\cos\Omega = q_0 \cdot q_1$ 2. If $\cos\Omega < 0$, negate one quaternion (shorter path) 3. Compute weights: $w_0 = \frac{\sin((1-t)\Omega)}{\sin\Omega}$, $w_1 = \frac{\sin(t\Omega)}{\sin\Omega}$ 4. Blend: $q(t) = w_0 q_0 + w_1 q_1$ **Cost:** ~12 muls + 7 adds + 1 acos + 2 sin + 1 sqrt + 1 div **Optimization:** When $\cos\Omega > 0.9995$ (small angle), use normalized lerp instead - saves trig functions for ~99% of cases! ### Matrix Interpolation (Much Harder!) **Problem:** Linear interpolation $R(t) = (1-t)R_0 + tR_1$ produces **non-orthogonal** matrices (invalid rotations!) **Correct approach:** 1. Extract axis-angle from both matrices (~40 ops + 2 acos) 2. Handle axis alignment issues 3. Interpolate (complex!) 4. Convert back to matrix (~30 ops + 2 trig) **Total:** ~70 ops + extensive logic ### Axis-Angle Interpolation (Unstable!) **Problems:** - Axis ambiguity: $(\theta, \hat{u}) = (2\pi - \theta, -\hat{u})$ are the same rotation - Non-constant angular velocity - Unstable when axes differ significantly | Method | Operations | Quality | Issues | | :-- | :-- | :-- | :-- | | **Quaternion SLERP** | **~12 muls + trig** | **Perfect** | **None!** ✓ | | Quat NLERP | ~8 muls + sqrt | Good | Slight speed variation | | Matrix interp | ~70 ops + 2 acos | Complex | Discontinuities | | Axis-angle | ~8 muls + sqrt | Poor | Non-constant velocity | ## Axis-Angle to Rotation Matrix (Rodrigues) $R = \cos\theta \, I + \sin\theta \, [\hat{u}]_\times + (1-\cos\theta)(\hat{u} \otimes \hat{u})$ **where:** Skew-symmetric cross-product matrix: \$\$ [\hat{u}]_\times = $$ \begin{bmatrix} 0 & -u_z & u_y \\ u_z & 0 & -u_x \\ -u_y & u_x & 0 \end{bmatrix} $$\$\$ Outer product: $$ \hat{u} \otimes \hat{u} = \begin{bmatrix} u_x^2 & u_xu_y & u_xu_z \\ u_yu_x & u_y^2 & u_yu_z \\ u_zu_x & u_zu_y & u_z^2 \end{bmatrix} $$ **Expanded matrix (let $$ c = \cos\theta $$, $$ s = \sin\theta $$, $$ C = 1-\cos\theta $$):** $$ R = \begin{bmatrix} c + u_x^2C & u_xu_yC - u_zs & u_xu_zC + u_ys \\ u_yu_xC + u_zs & c + u_y^2C & u_yu_zC - u_xs \\ u_zu_xC - u_ys & u_zu_yC + u_xs & c + u_z^2C \end{bmatrix} $$ **Cost to build:** 15 muls + 9 adds + 2 trig ## Corrected Operation Counts Good eye spotting my errors! Here's the corrected minimal quaternion: **Optimal quaternion rotation with pre-computation:** Pre-compute: - $$ a = 2w^2 - 1 $$ - $$ b = 2w $$ Then: ```c d = q⃗·v⃗ // 3 muls, 2 adds c⃗ = q⃗ × v⃗ // 6 muls, 3 adds v⃗' = a·v⃗ + (2d)·q⃗ + b·c⃗ // 3+3+3 muls, 6 adds ``` **CORRECTED TOTAL: 15 muls + 11 adds** (with 2 pre-computed values) This beats Rodrigues by 3 multiplications! ### Why Quaternions Won Historically **1980s-1990s context:** - Computer graphics needed smooth orientation interpolation - Flight simulators needed gimbal-lock-free tracking - Every multiply mattered, but **algorithmic quality** mattered more **Quaternions solved:** ✓ SLERP is mathematically elegant ✓ No gimbal lock (unlike Euler angles) ✓ Constant angular velocity ✓ Compact storage (4 values) ✓ Numerical stability The performance was a **bonus** - they chose quaternions for **interpolation quality** and **no singularities**! **Modern use:** Game engines, VR/AR, drones, robotics - all use quaternions because SLERP remains unmatched for smooth orientation interpolation. --- ## Finding Axis-Angle to Align Two Coordinate Frames Great question! You're asking: **given two coordinate frames (sets of orthonormal basis vectors), what axis-angle rotation transforms one into the other?** ### Problem Setup **Initial frame A:** - **x**_A = (1, 0, 0) - **y**_A = (0, 1, 0) - **z**_A = (0, 0, 1) **Target frame B:** - **x**_B, **y**_B, **z**_B (orthonormal unit vectors) **Goal:** Find rotation R such that: - R · **x**_A = **x**_B - R · **y**_A = **y**_B - R · **z**_A = **z**_B ### Method 1: Build Matrix, Extract Axis-Angle **Step 1:** Construct rotation matrix from target frame The columns are the target basis vectors: $$ R = \begin{bmatrix} x_B.x & y_B.x & z_B.x \\ x_B.y & y_B.y & z_B.y \\ x_B.z & y_B.z & z_B.z \end{bmatrix} $$ **Step 2:** Extract angle from trace $\theta = \arccos\left(\frac{\text{trace}(R) - 1}{2}\right)$ where trace(R) = R + R + R[^7_1][^7_2] **Step 3:** Extract axis from skew-symmetric part When $\sin\theta \neq 0$: \$\$\hat{u} = \frac{1}{2\sin\theta} \begin{bmatrix} R - R \$\$2][^7_1] R - R \$$ 2] R - R[^7_1] \end{bmatrix} $$ This extracts the skew-symmetric (anti-symmetric) part of R! **Special cases:** - θ ≈ 0: Frames already aligned - θ ≈ π: Axis is eigenvector of R with eigenvalue +1 ### Method 2: Geometric Construction (Single Axis) If you only need to align **one** axis (say, **z**_A → **z**_B): **Rotation axis:** Perpendicular to both $\hat{u} = \frac{\mathbf{z}_A \times \mathbf{z}_B}{|\mathbf{z}_A \times \mathbf{z}_B|}$ **Rotation angle:** $\theta = \arccos(\mathbf{z}_A \cdot \mathbf{z}_B)$ **Note:** This only aligns ONE axis! After rotating, **x**_A and **y**_A may not align with **x**_B, **y**_B. ### Method 3: Two General Frames If both frames A and B are arbitrary (not aligned with standard axes): **Step 1:** Compute relative rotation $R = B \cdot A^T$ where A and B are matrices whose columns are the frame basis vectors. **Step 2:** Extract axis-angle from R using Method 1 ### Concrete Example **Frame A:** Standard basis **Frame B:** Rotated 90° around z-axis $$ R = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & -1 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} $$ **Extract:** - trace(R) = 0 + 0 + 1 = 1 - θ = arccos((1-1)/2) = arccos(0) = 90° - Axis components: - R - R = 0 - 0 = 0[^7_1][^7_2] - R - R = 0 - 0 = 0[^7_2] - R - R = 1 - (-1) = 2[^7_1] - û = (0, 0, 2)/(2·sin(90°)) = (0, 0, 1) ✓ **Result:** Rotate 90° around z-axis! ### General Algorithm Summary ``` Given frames A and B (as 3×3 matrices with basis vectors as columns): 1. R = B · A^T 2. θ = arccos((trace(R) - 1) / 2) 3. û = [R[^7_2][^7_1] - R[^7_1][^7_2], R[^7_0][^7_2] - R[^7_2][^7_0], R[^7_1][^7_0] - R[^7_0][^7_1]] / (2·sin(θ)) 4. Apply rotation: v' = Rodrigues(v, û, θ) ``` ### Applications This technique is used extensively in: - **Robotics:** Finding joint rotations to reach target end-effector orientation - **Computer vision:** Camera pose estimation from feature correspondences - **Aerospace:** Attitude determination from IMU/star tracker readings - **Animation:** Inverse kinematics for character rigs The key insight: The rotation aligning two frames is **unique** (up to 2π ambiguity) and can be directly extracted from the relative rotation matrix! <div align="center">⁂</div> [^7_1]: https://www.studocu.com/in/document/university-of-madras/computer-science/c-programming-ex-no-6-9-matrix-and-shape-class-implementation/134126889 [^7_2]: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66076737/scheme-matrix-operation-accumulate
![https://r2cdn.perplexity.ai/pplx-full-logo-primary-dark%402x.png"](https://r2cdn.perplexity.ai/pplx-full-logo-primary-dark%402x.png"){kind=link}