https://wallstreetonparade.com/2025/04/the-bond-crisis-last-week-was-a-global-no-confidence-vote-in-u-s-president-donald-trump/


By Pam Martens and Russ Martens: April 13, 2025 ~

Donald Trump -- Pied Piper to Wall Street (Thumbnail)U.S. President Donald
Trump’s reputation for chaos; his longstanding history of thumbing his nose
at the rule of law; his unpresidential insults directed at world leaders
and willingness to turn his back on longstanding U.S. allies; and his
packing of top cabinet posts with preposterously unqualified loyalists –
have now delivered the inevitable blow to two of America’s most critical
financial assets in domestic and international markets: the U.S. dollar and
U.S. Treasury securities. Instead of performing their usual role as safe
havens in times of turmoil, they are now indelibly linked to the Trump
brand of erratic behavior.

Both the U.S. Dollar and U.S. Treasury securities are in a downtrend, with
the 10-year Treasury note taking a wild plunge in value last week.

Mark Blyth, a political economist at Brown University, was quoted in the
New York Times today with this unvarnished assessment: “The whole world has
decided that the U.S. government has no idea what it’s doing.”

That thinking was echoed in the Canadian press, with Moshe Lander,
Professor of Economics at Concordia University in Montreal, being quoted as
follows: “The U.S. government is the source of instability … nobody trusts
that the White House knows what it’s doing. People are racing away from the
source of instability.”

After Trump set off a four-day rout in stock prices from his tariff plans –
including a 2200 point plunge in the Dow Jones Industrial Average on
Friday, April 4 – Trump did an abrupt flip-flop on Wednesday, April 9,
announcing a 90-day pause on his reciprocal tariffs, but keeping his 10
percent baseline duties and 145 percent tariffs on China.

Wall Street On Parade has been warning for some time now that putting a
34-count convicted felon in the Oval Office – with a long, documented
history of flouting the law and craving chaos as a personal attention
booster – could lead to a dramatic loss of confidence in the U.S.
government and attendant negative economic fallout.

Gerald Baker’s latest column in the Wall Street Journal (paywall) notes
this:

“America’s reputation, built on its ideals and burnished over centuries, is
the greatest geopolitical brand ever created. But as someone put it to me
this past week, we may be witnessing the greatest exercise in brand
destruction in history. Brands have real value. It isn’t always easy to
calculate, but businesses from BlackBerry to Bud Light know when they have
lost it. Destroying geopolitical brand value can be devastating too.”

Take a few moments to think about the ramifications of this rapid
reappraisal of the U.S. government brand. When investors and allies dump
Treasury securities because they no longer have confidence that the U.S. is
under sane leadership, it pushes up the yield. That raises mortgage rates
(which are benchmarked against the 10-year Treasury note) in an already
struggling housing market; it raises credit card interest rates which
restrain consumer spending (which represents two-thirds of U.S. GDP); and,
critically, it makes it more expensive for the U.S. to issue new debt
because it has to offer higher fixed interest rates to compensate for the
weaker demand.

According to U.S. Treasury data, as of last month the U.S. is paying $582
billion in interest annually on its outstanding Treasury debt. This
represents 16 percent of total federal spending for fiscal year 2025. If
the U.S. government is forced to pay higher rates of interest on its debt
because Trump undermines confidence in U.S. government functioning,
interest costs could exponentially explode and put the credit rating of
U.S. debt in jeopardy.

There is already evidence of weakening demand for U.S. debt. Morningstar
reported the following regarding last Tuesday’s $58 billion 3-year note
auction: “The auction of 3-year Treasuries showed very weak domestic
demand, with only 6.2% absorbed by US insurance and pension funds, compared
with an average of 19.0%.” According to other sources, Primary Dealers, who
are contractually obligated to the U.S. government to bid at Treasury
auctions, were stuck with about a quarter of the 3-year notes offered in
the auction.

“Primary Dealers” is Fed code for the trading houses on Wall Street – the
largest of which are owned by the federally-insured megabanks on Wall
Street. Those names include JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup’s Citibank, Bank of
America, Morgan Stanley, and Goldman Sachs.

Given that the Federal Reserve has had to engage in bailouts of these Wall
Street megabanks four times in the past 17 years, including the worst
financial crisis since the Great Depression in 2008, one would think that
the leaders of these institutions might find their voice and loudly call
for Congress to fulfill its mandate as a co-equal branch of government and
stop these wild and confidence-busting machinations from the White House.

Reply via email to