karl3＠writeme.com wrote: > karl3＠writeme.com wrote: > > This is a gpt completion being sent to the wrong thread. > > https://chatgpt.com/share/67acb1d8-7df4-8013-b49c-a902213e9bf3 > > To clarify, the weird thing here is that there are no web search results > > for others encountering this issue, when it is normal to make untyped-like > > interfaces in C++ and many conventional untyped languages provide for both > > operator[] and bool use of their type. > > Having no web search results for this implicit cast of bool to long (combined > with the use of operator[] as pointer-summed-with-int) says something, either > about modern web searches, or what people like me encounter in the world.
Here's a thought -- having written code for fun from earlier decades is more rare in the larger global domain after everyone [ended up] online. Then, having severe dissociative/FND from doing so even more rare. Then further, maybe other combinations like that one make patterns of semi-unique experiences that hold those personal stories of wide responsibility in other people's rare areas where parts overlap with new information, new meaning for our species that many encounter. Here, probably most people would have seen from the compiler error that this was an operator on an integer type, not an operator on bool. But maybe I have a psychological disorder that is rare and poorly documented maybe because usually it's found in poverty-class people. > > It's hard for me to talk about this rationally and accurately, but there > > has been something going on for some time with what people encounter in the > > world, where people avoid certain things, or the world rests as if people > > avoided certain things. This is a pretty harmless instance and example of > > this. > > My path is different, I'm sure many others' are. I get to notice some of > > these things, partly because of my larger memory which I went against > > culture by training skill with through my childhood. It didn't make sense > > to me to not train one's mind, and instead rely on tools. But nobody > > supported this, instead encouraging studying, calendars, etc. I made sure I > > always tried to remember before using a tool. > > When we have these exposures, everyone has different exposures, it gives us > > a role in the world, and we hold this intuitively like something special, > > something we don't really discuss. We also have a sense of other people > > having those things out there. Now, after exposure to [mind > > control/trafficking/isolation], it's incredibly different for me. > > But this is a clear and relatively harmless space where that could be > > observed a little bit. > > What is the meaning here? What is my role? > > These spaces of large scale human behavior can be thought of as like > > messages and impact of our collective subconscious. Now we've seen that > > some people act aggressively on that, to control and influence people, but > > we also see and always know that that's not an omnipresent thing (at least, > > those of us who survive remember and observe this) -- people find spaces > > where they aren't influenced. > > Where are the spaces where I could survive? > > Something like a compiler error is harmless. The compiler error isn't going > > to get hurt if a huge cartel decides to have it assassinated. The suffering > > associated is small. > > What kinds of similar things provide for more safe consideration? > > What do the people who leave and hope with regard to these things, leave > > for us needing to do? > > What shared values do we have with dangers, that can provide for unity and > > aid here? > > What does it mean ...? > > I didn't write right. I broke it. But there's something. > > Why would an influence like this happen? What is it avoiding? What did it > > stem from? > > Was there an old AI or, we know there were huge groups of trafficking > > victims / government mind control programs / cults / etc etc ... What was > > the depth and complexity of what they were influencing? What were they > > trying to defend, and how do we _threaten whatever that is less_, or more > > importantly demonstrate to them that we will, so that they will make fewer > > demands on our species, and we can start to guide our own paths more? > > Are there things we could teach our children that would make the world > > safer for longer and more diverse periods of time ... > >
