karl3ļ¼ writeme.com wrote: > This is a gpt completion being sent to the wrong thread. > > https://chatgpt.com/share/67acb1d8-7df4-8013-b49c-a902213e9bf3
To clarify, the weird thing here is that there are no web search results for others encountering this issue, when it is normal to make untyped-like interfaces in C++ and many conventional untyped languages provide for both operator[] and bool use of their type. Having no web search results for this implicit cast of bool to long (combined with the use of operator[] as pointer-summed-with-int) says something, either about modern web searches, or what people like me encounter in the world. > > It's hard for me to talk about this rationally and accurately, but there has > been something going on for some time with what people encounter in the > world, where people avoid certain things, or the world rests as if people > avoided certain things. This is a pretty harmless instance and example of > this. > > My path is different, I'm sure many others' are. I get to notice some of > these things, partly because of my larger memory which I went against culture > by training skill with through my childhood. It didn't make sense to me to > not train one's mind, and instead rely on tools. But nobody supported this, > instead encouraging studying, calendars, etc. I made sure I always tried to > remember before using a tool. > > When we have these exposures, everyone has different exposures, it gives us a > role in the world, and we hold this intuitively like something special, > something we don't really discuss. We also have a sense of other people > having those things out there. Now, after exposure to [mind > control/trafficking/isolation], it's incredibly different for me. > > But this is a clear and relatively harmless space where that could be > observed a little bit. > > What is the meaning here? What is my role? > > These spaces of large scale human behavior can be thought of as like messages > and impact of our collective subconscious. Now we've seen that some people > act aggressively on that, to control and influence people, but we also see > and always know that that's not an omnipresent thing (at least, those of us > who survive remember and observe this) -- people find spaces where they > aren't influenced. > > Where are the spaces where I could survive? > > Something like a compiler error is harmless. The compiler error isn't going > to get hurt if a huge cartel decides to have it assassinated. The suffering > associated is small. > > What kinds of similar things provide for more safe consideration? > > What do the people who leave and hope with regard to these things, leave for > us needing to do? > > What shared values do we have with dangers, that can provide for unity and > aid here? > > What does it mean ...? > > I didn't write right. I broke it. But there's something. > > Why would an influence like this happen? What is it avoiding? What did it > stem from? > > Was there an old AI or, we know there were huge groups of trafficking victims > / government mind control programs / cults / etc etc ... What was the depth > and complexity of what they were influencing? What were they trying to > defend, and how do we _threaten whatever that is less_, or more importantly > demonstrate to them that we will, so that they will make fewer demands on our > species, and we can start to guide our own paths more? > > Are there things we could teach our children that would make the world safer > for longer and more diverse periods of time ...
