On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 10:50:28PM +0300, Eray Ozkural wrote: >No, you have not done adequate testing obviously.
And you have not adequately understood how to use email. Starting a new accusatory thread, expecting people to remember you and your important assertions, without any references to past discussions makes you seem rather clueless. >Also, why is it so difficult to accept that there may be something >wrong with gcc-4 in cygwin? Somebody wrote a patch that has only >limited applicability, and guess what it does have limited >applicability. Because, given the hostility and arrogance of your email, it is very easy to dismiss your opinions. >PS: CC to me I am not subscribed to this list And, then there's this, too. You desperately need to read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
