I wrote: > Despite IWAMURO Motonori's withdrawal, I think symmetry would be the > right approach to take. The major aspect is how to reflect the actual > behaviour of existing terminal environments. ...
> ... > The "locale interface" (syntax and semantics of LC_* strings) is defined > in a modular way and so the implementations should be - let them fix it. Corinna Vinschen wrote: > What do you think, how big will be the acceptance of this approach > outside of newlib/Cygwin? I have no idea about the acceptance of the whole concept, especially (as I had warned) about changing the width of the CJK locales WITHOUT modifier as IWAMURO Motonori insisted. But I guess a general solution of the width issue will be more appreciated than one that handles only the CJK locales. Thomas -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
