On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 15:00, Charles Wilson wrote: > Julio Costa wrote: >> Came to think of it, there is also another possibility (and a simpler >> one), and that is to code the --yes option on the ssh-host-config to >> use the (new) -f option to the csih, avoiding coding the extra >> parameter (--force) just for this behavior. After all, this behavior >> should be required for --yes and possibly is not very useful if >> ssh-host-config is not invoked with --yes. >> What do you think? > > That's what I did for iu-config; > > -y | --yes ) > csih_auto_answer=yes > opt_force=yes > ;; > > -n | --no ) > csih_auto_answer=no > opt_force=yes > ;; > > I then used $opt_force to determine whether -f should be passed to > csih_select_privileged_username. >
Yes, you're right: with the --no option the 'force' option should also be a requirement. After all, if it is in 'auto-mode' doesn't make sense to ask for confirmations, does it? :) I'm a bit in the busy side right now, but you can count with that patch until tomorrow, at most. Have fun! ___________ Julio Costa -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
