On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Dave Korn wrote:
It's a bit of a kludge compared to having a real honest-to-god cross-compiler. It's never worked entirely right in terms of keeping cygwin and mingw headers and libs completely separate. A full-blown mingw cross-compiler won't cost that much in terms of disk space and the reliability and correctness improvements will be worth it.
That's very interesting. I've been using -mno-cygwin for several years, having done many many thousands of compiles and links using it, and I have never had a problem with either headers or libraries! Is there a recommended alternative?
Steve -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
