Steve Thompson wrote:
> uOn Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>
>> Please, NO! -mno-cygwin needs to go away already.
>
> Why?
>
It's a bit of a kludge compared to having a real honest-to-god
cross-compiler. It's never worked entirely right in terms of keeping cygwin
and mingw headers and libs completely separate. A full-blown mingw
cross-compiler won't cost that much in terms of disk space and the reliability
and correctness improvements will be worth it.
cheers,
DaveK
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
