On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 01:37:57PM -0400, NightStrike wrote: >On 4/5/08, Andrew DeFaria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >[snip lots of useless arguing] >The takeaway is that if bash isn't handling a SIGHUP properly (As >Paul-Kenji pointed out), then that is an issue that can't be ignored >by saying "just use cygwin ssh".
Actually, maybe I missed something but the comment was "the process also get a sighup I think". That's hardly bug report or a definitive problem statement. I'd be very amazed if bash wasn't correctly dealing with SIGHUPs the same way it does on linux. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
