On 04 October 2007 16:04, Lynn Winebarger wrote:
> On 10/4/07, Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 04 October 2007 15:26, Lynn Winebarger wrote:
>>> Thanks, Dave. I did compile a hello-world.c program, and it ran, but
>>> I had also compiled PLT scheme v360 before (needed to bootstrap
>>> Larceny) and had run it without problem as well (I had thought this
>>> might be a permission issue, because what bash actually reports is
>>> "Access denied" - the underlying error took further investigation)
>>
>> Actually, I was trying to ask if you'd compiled a basic "helloworld" with
>> your new larceny compiler, or indeed if this example of yours is already a
>> very simple test program; i.e. is it only complex larceny executables that
>> don't work, or even the very simplest ones.
>>
> I did not understand. No, the larceny binary (runtime
> system/interpreter) won't load at all - it doesn't even make it to the
> entry point.
Oh, my misunderstanding; I thought that we were talking about the compiled
executables /generated by/ the larceny compiler, rather than the actual
larceny compiler itself.
> I'm more than willing to send the "executable". It
> might be something an expert could quickly spot. Or the linker map
> output, if that would be useful.
Yes, why not; feel free to send them both to me, off list. Can't promise
I'll spot anything, but I'll take a look. (My first WAG would be that the
sassy assembler does something different from other w32 assemblers and that's
where the trouble is coming from).
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
