On 10/4/07, Lynn Winebarger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/4/07, Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 04 October 2007 15:26, Lynn Winebarger wrote: > > > Thanks, Dave. I did compile a hello-world.c program, and it ran, but > > > I had also compiled PLT scheme v360 before (needed to bootstrap > > > Larceny) and had run it without problem as well (I had thought this > > > might be a permission issue, because what bash actually reports is > > > "Access denied" - the underlying error took further investigation) > > > > Actually, I was trying to ask if you'd compiled a basic "helloworld" with > > your new larceny compiler, or indeed if this example of yours is already a > > very simple test program; i.e. is it only complex larceny executables that > > don't work, or even the very simplest ones. > > > I did not understand. No, the larceny binary (runtime > system/interpreter) won't load at all - it doesn't even make it to the > entry point. I'm more than willing to send the "executable". It > might be something an expert could quickly spot. Or the linker map > output, if that would be useful.
Or, if someone knows of a program, or a pointer to what black magic Windows does to determine that a PE file is "valid". I have briefly reviewed the PE documentation MS provides, but nothing has leaped out at me (e.g. the flags on the sections appear consistent with their specification). Lynn -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
