On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 02:22:30PM -0500, DePriest, Jason R. wrote: > On 6/6/07, Dave wrote: >> Brian Dessent wrote: >> > Samuel Thibault wrote: >> >> Mmm, because for a blind person this is a very basic package? >> > >> > Perhaps, but that doesn't mean that most Cygwin users are blind. >> >> Last I heard, setup.exe was not particularly friendly wrt screen readers >> (cf. package selection). Hence the visually impaired would have >> difficulty selecting brltty for installation. >> >> In addition to installation brltty also needs an amount of configuration >> to select the type of terminal to use, and for the daemon to be started. >> >> Despite the latter I would suggest that (at least the non-X bit of) >> brltty should be kept in Base to make things simpler for those who need >> it. At least until we get that revamped setup.exe :) > > It seems that when you trace the requirements of brltty down, you end > up with xorg, perl, and python packages getting installed. > > So, do we want those to be considered part of Base?
No. I've removed it from Base. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
