On Jul 3 01:32, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hi, > > Samuel Thibault, le Thu 07 Jun 2007 19:59:25 +0800, a écrit : > > Phil Betts, le Thu 07 Jun 2007 12:14:33 +0100, a écrit : > > > Might I suggest a compromise? Create a new "Accessibility" group in > > > setup. It would (at least for now) be the first group > > > > That would be a fair compromise, yes. > > There was no more comment on this. Is this OK?
In theory, yes. But I'm still not happy with the dependency to ws2_32. It should still go away and I don't see any reason to keep it. For using local named pipes you don't need winsock anyway, and for remote connections you should use Cygwin sockets. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
