On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jan 13 14:08, Igor Peshansky wrote:
> > On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> [... needless full quote deleted ...]
>
> > > Can anybody explain to me why moving to the bin should take that
> > > long on another machine? Apparently the performance hit is barely
> > > visible on my machine. It's hardly worth to change the code.
> > >
> > > Maybe I'm just "suffering" from caching effects? I added a really long
> > > `find' run between creating and deleting the files, but that made the
> > > results in both variations even better! 1.4s vs. 1.2s.
> > >
> > > So, what's up on the slow machines? Virus checker? But why should an
> > > open/close sequence not be hit by a virus checker, while an open/move/
> > > close sequence gets hit that badly? I don't quite get it.
> >
> > Does <http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-01/msg00383.html> seem like a
> > plausible answer? I'm just reiterating it because it may have been lost
> > among other suggestions in this thread.
>
> What about http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-01/msg00384.html?
D'oh. Sorry for the noise.
Igor
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ Igor Peshansky, Ph.D. (name changed!)
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' old name: Igor Pechtchanski
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
Freedom is just another word for "nothing left to lose"... -- Janis Joplin
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
