On Jan 13 14:08, Igor Peshansky wrote: > On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
[... needless full quote deleted ...] > > Can anybody explain to me why moving to the bin should take that > > long on another machine? Apparently the performance hit is barely > > visible on my machine. It's hardly worth to change the code. > > > > Maybe I'm just "suffering" from caching effects? I added a really long > > `find' run between creating and deleting the files, but that made the > > results in both variations even better! 1.4s vs. 1.2s. > > > > So, what's up on the slow machines? Virus checker? But why should an > > open/close sequence not be hit by a virus checker, while an open/move/ > > close sequence gets hit that badly? I don't quite get it. > > Does <http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-01/msg00383.html> seem like a > plausible answer? I'm just reiterating it because it may have been lost > among other suggestions in this thread. What about http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-01/msg00384.html? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
