Christopher Faylor schrieb: > On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:18:56PM -0500, Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports) wrote: <snip> > Unless I'm missing something, the backtrace is useless and probably doesn't > show a real problem. It is just YA example of the "OMG! I get SIGSEGV's in > GDB!!!!" problem which we must discuss every day here.
One more reason to have an updated gdb binary package. Is nobody there who can make a gdb binary package instead that everyone has to compile it by himself ? Making a package is not very much work, giving support more. As starting point I've made a binary snapshot located on http://webdev.cegit.de/snapshots/cygwin/ Regards Ralf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
