On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:25:11AM +0200, Ralf Habacker wrote: >Christopher Faylor schrieb: >> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:18:56PM -0500, Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports) wrote: ><snip> >> Unless I'm missing something, the backtrace is useless and probably doesn't >> show a real problem. It is just YA example of the "OMG! I get SIGSEGV's in >> GDB!!!!" problem which we must discuss every day here. > >One more reason to have an updated gdb binary package. Is nobody there >who can make a gdb binary package instead that everyone has to compile >it by himself ? Making a package is not very much work, giving support >more. As starting point I've made a binary snapshot located on >http://webdev.cegit.de/snapshots/cygwin/
Gee. I wonder if there's some reason why there isn't already a gdb binary package. I guess it is usually safe to assume WJM but in this case it isn't the case. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
