-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: >> From: Corinna Vinschen >> Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 6:38 AM >> To: cygwin@cygwin.com >> Subject: Re: Windows 95 support ? >> >> On Apr 21 12:59, Samuel Thibault wrote: > [snip] >>> Ok, but the question remains: does cygwin still target windows 95? >> Just the setup tool has some problem, apparently. >> Cygwin still runs on 95, which will probably change at one >> point, since it's getting incredibly awkward to support it. >> >> >> Corinna >> > > Perhaps, but as long as the Cygwin DLL etc do support 95, it seems that > Setup should be self contained and not require W95 users (all dozen of them > ;-)) to hunt down DLLs all over the internet. Perhaps I'll whip up a > regular Setup installer which includes the necessary redistributables.
Why bother? To put this in perspective, this affects only users who are using Windows 95 original edition (*not* any OSR version), *AND* have not installed a non-ancient Internet Explorer version. For this tiny minority, is it *really* worth the confusion of a separate Cygwin setup bundle, as compared with the alternative of just writing a FAQ entry explaining how to get the necessary prerequisites? Max. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (Cygwin) iD8DBQFETQY1fFNSmcDyxYARAlxNAJ91cKKwpDVN6u4tNMOxLzmgo7fIWACfdtKI WJCi/95aBY3yBoA8mVpuZiw= =maQh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
