> From: Brian Dessent > > "Gary R. Van Sickle" wrote: > > > Sorry folks, this is going to probably have to wait until > the weekend. > > But I am still about 99.44% confident that this is solvable in a > > reasonably painless manner. > > Don't you think it's sufficient just to leave it at "thou must install > IE3+"? > > Brian
It probably is, and that was probably my argument at the time*. But I also believe that if a shortcoming such as this can be solved in a simple and non-intrusive manner, it should be solved. I think I now have that solution, so I'm gonna give it a go. -- Gary R. Van Sickle * Assuming I actually argued for this; I frankly can't recall if I was pushing for it or not. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
