On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:38:42PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:37:12PM -0500, Bob Rossi wrote:
> >On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 09:58:17PM +0000, Eric Blake wrote:
> >>There's always another alternative - propose to maintain your package
> >>as part of the official cygwin distribution. Then you just point
> >>people to cygwin.com, and source code distribution becomes cygwin.com's
> >>problem instead of yours.
> >
> >OK, here I do have some evidence to support me when I say you are
> >partially wrong.
> >http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-08/msg00064.html So, that is
> >not a good alternative.
>
> I retract my veto. If this is submitted via normal channels, I will have
> no objections.
Well, I suppose
"anything in computer science is [possible], if you are willing to write
the code and wait long enough"?
Thanks,
Bob Rossi
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
