On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:37:12PM -0500, Bob Rossi wrote: >On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 09:58:17PM +0000, Eric Blake wrote: >>There's always another alternative - propose to maintain your package >>as part of the official cygwin distribution. Then you just point >>people to cygwin.com, and source code distribution becomes cygwin.com's >>problem instead of yours. > >OK, here I do have some evidence to support me when I say you are >partially wrong. >http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-08/msg00064.html So, that is >not a good alternative.
I retract my veto. If this is submitted via normal channels, I will have no objections. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
