Satish Balay wrote: > Doesn't setup have similar problem with updating 'packages' for > running apps? I think it prompts for a reboot to complete. So I'm > guessing the same approach can be used when it needs a rebase.
Yes, of course setup already has that logic. That's what I was referring to above about name.dll.new. My point was that you can't just have setup call the rebaseall script as a final step because the "in use handling" of the two has to be in sync. It has to be tightly integrated. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
