----Original Message----
>From: Igor Pechtchanski
>Sent: 02 June 2005 18:08
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Sunil wrote:
>
>>> amusingling enough -- their
>>> execution times are *slower* than cygwin's... Of
>>
>> this is a joke right? I found SFU to be at least 2-3
>> times faster in loading and executing programs in
>> general. Its too bad their POSIX imple. is less than
>> half baked and unuseable for building any package
>> OOTB.
>
> Any favorable mention of SFU on this list had better be a joke. :-)
> Igor
> --
... or had better have a 'T' between the 'S' and the 'U'!
:)
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
